- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 00:38:04 -0800
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Jan 31, 2013, at 11:34 PM, James M Snell wrote: > +1 ... sending a simple "HTTP20<CRLF>" seems it would be sufficiently effective. The 20 is the major and minor version. The preamble for http/2.1 would be "HTTP21<CRLF>" I suggest "spdy" is a more interesting prefix, and less likely to be misinterpreted by parsers looking for "HTTP/1.1". I am not sure that having a minor version is useful in a binary protocol. ....Roy
Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 08:38:27 UTC