Re: Should Web Services be served by a different HTTP n+1? from Martin Thomson on 2013-01-17 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2013)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:45:22 -0800
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU6RSo29WPbPTNvq19G6tKyhynkAJuF7utER6mS-HcBqw@mail.gmail.com>

On 11 January 2013 12:05, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote:
> So as far as I am concerned, I would like there to be a HTTP/2.0 for Web
> Services but it is probably one that is a lot, lot smaller than 1.1.
> Something that looks more like CoAp/Core than the HTTP/2.0 proposals.

I also disagree.  If you desire a feature set that another protocol
provides, you are free to use that protocol.

Received on Thursday, 17 January 2013 00:45:51 UTC