- From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:30:45 -0800
- To: "Brian Raymor (MS OPEN TECH)" <Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:31:12 UTC
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Brian Raymor (MS OPEN TECH) < Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com> wrote: > In the Speed+Mobility draft, we removed CREDENTIAL because: > > CREDENTIAL: This is removed from HTTP Speed+Mobility because we > believe it is not compatible with options such as TLS SNI. For > this proposal, a session MUST only target one origin as described > in [RFC6454]. > > Concerns were also raised in "CREDENTIAL really needed?" ( > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!searchin/spdy-dev/credential/spdy-dev/WazzPBFbdpk/yayPrNTehYYJ). > Based on the responses, it appears that CREDENTIAL was an experimental > feature not used in SPDY/3, but intended to be replaced with a different > design in the future; therefore, it could safely be deprecated or ignored. > Correct. > > I propose that CREDENTIAL be removed from the HTTP/2.0 draft. Related > issue: > > https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/39 +1, at least until we get to doing DNS/CERT push, but no need for it today. -=R > > > > Brian Raymor > Senior Program Manager > Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. > A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation > > > >
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:31:12 UTC