Re: Do we kill the "Host:" header in HTTP/2 ?

In such edge cases, the separate :scheme header can be used.

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:43 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 1, 2013 1:50 AM, "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> >> This makes several assumptions which are false and will cause a lot of
> >> trouble:
> >>  1) scheme of URI is always http(s)://.
> >
> > Yes, it does make this assumption. It seems, rather safe to me. What
> other
> > schemes do we need to support?
>
> I don't think that's a safe assumption at all.  I've heard of other
> schemes used in production systems (in enterprises, granted, but so
> what, the same might be useful in the Internet).
>
> Nico
> --
>