- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:18:39 -0800
- To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
- Cc: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 16 January 2013 17:13, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote: > I'd actually like the timestamp format to support sub millisecond > timescales.. (maybe another 8 bits) to help http scale in both directions. There have been times when I have wanted better-than-second resolution on HTTP dates. I'm not sure that nanosecond resolution is really necessary, but I'm not fundamentally opposed to the idea.
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2013 01:19:06 UTC