On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > Do you have some suggestions Martin? > The obvious thing in my mind is to get submissions from site owners, but > that takes interest on their part first. :/ > HTTP Archive is now scanning ~300K top domains (at least according to Alexa). While its still "top site" biased, I think that's a pretty good sample to work with. I believe we should be able to get the HAR files from it. ig > > On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 12:53 AM, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp > > wrote: > >> On 2013/01/06 14:57, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> >>> Quick follow-up: >>> >>> I posted more about this here: >>> http://www.mnot.net/blog/2013/**01/04/http2_header_compression<http://www.mnot.net/blog/2013/01/04/http2_header_compression> >>> >>> In particular, we have graphs for all of the HAR samples I took earlier: >>> http://http2.github.com/http_**samples/mnot/<http://http2.github.com/http_samples/mnot/> >>> >> >> These look very interesting. Just two points for the moment: >> >> - Drawing connected curves seems misleading, because we are not >> mesuring/showing a continuous quantity that varies over time, but discrete >> requests and responses. >> >> - The data sample includes big guys only. Some criticism of speedy has >> said that it is geared towards the big guys. Is there a way to get some >> more of an impression of how headers look at the long tail of websites? >> >> Regards, Martin. >> >> >
Received on Sunday, 6 January 2013 20:35:45 UTC