- From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:08:46 -0500
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
> How about this: > > OLD > Doing so, however, results in a variety of issues affecting the > cacheability of responses. > > NEW > But any mechanism that alters the URI can have undesirable effects, > such as when caches record the altered URI. This, along with Julian's comments, are all the changes we've gotten so far. Not wanting to distract from httpbis chartered work, but unless there are other comments now... ...I'd like James to put in a revised I-D, and then I'd like to click the "approve" button. Any objections to that plan? James, there's currently a bug in the automated submission tool, so let's wait until early next week for that to be fixed and to see if anyone responds to this note. Then go ahead and fire off a revised I-D. I'll change the document state to "Revised I-D Needed" now. Barry
Received on Friday, 4 January 2013 01:09:13 UTC