Re: [editorial] awkward sentence for a MUST statement in section 6.3 Upgrade

Very good catch, Karl!

> In section 6.3 Upgrade in Version 21 of messaging
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-21#section-6.3
>
>     For example, if the Upgrade header field
>     is received in a GET request and the server
>     decides to switch protocols, then it MUST
>     first respond with a 101 (Switching Protocols)
>     message in HTTP/1.1 and then immediately
>     follow that with the new protocol's equivalent
>     of a response to a GET on the target resource.
>
> I would drop the "For example", if it's really a MUST.

I think that's not the right fix, though.  It really is an example,
and the MUST is already specified above this.  I think the right
answer is to lower-case the "must", or change it to "then it first
responds... and immediately follows that...."

Barry

Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2013 15:43:51 UTC