On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>wrote: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > -------- > In message < > CAOdDvNqKxMuzvEC+p+ooZOsjUZ5Wd5V0YXrdbPHPTdFaWK_mmg@mail.gmail.com> > , Patrick McManus writes: > > >[...] but it still represents 500ms of serialization time on a 1mb/s > >network.. > > Just because you _can_ send longer frames, doesn't mean that it is > a good idea to do so. > > However, enforcing QoS by restricting frame-lengths is bad architecture, > when HTTP is being used for a lot of bulk applications as well. > > imo, I've made a quantifiable responsiveness argument but you haven't made an overhead argument that shows a problem for bulk applications.
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 16:05:59 UTC