- From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:22:45 -0700
- To: RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, agl@google.com
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAP+FsNdQ7mNbsaAiUqEF22Oh8KMaK3UWUWFzWE=K0jQbkM7t1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Herve-- We need an option which disables prefix matching on the HeaderDiff compressor. The strategies I see in the code still allow many headers to be attacked (if they include commas). I believe that it is still possible to probe interesting data out of various fields of the URL, for example, or even cookies, assuming they aren't B64 encoded. -=R On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > There are two obvious strategies here: What we do now, and using what SPDY > does today (share connections if the certs match and DNS resolution of the > new hostname overlaps with those of the current connection). > > -=R > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:21 AM, RUELLAN Herve < > Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr> wrote: > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net] >> > Sent: lundi 25 mars 2013 06:56 >> > To: RUELLAN Herve >> > Cc: Roberto Peon; ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group >> > Subject: Re: Choosing a header compression algorithm >> > >> > >> > On 23/03/2013, at 5:04 AM, RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > I think it would be good to move this from the compressors to the >> > streamifier. In addition, it would be interesting to look at a more >> realistic >> > streamifier that could for example unshard hosts (expecting that >> HTTP/2.0 >> > will remove the sharding currently done by server developers). >> > >> > Right now, it combines all requests to the same TLD (according to the >> Public >> > Suffix List) into a single "connection." Do you have a suggestion for >> how to do >> > it better? >> >> I think this should provide some "realistic" results as a starting point. >> Depending on what we want to measure, we may want to refine this a bit. >> >> Hervé. >> >> > I've just pushed a quick and dirty fix to use a new instance of each >> > compressor for each connection; the results are pretty even between >> > headerdiff and delta2, with a small increase in each: >> > >> > * TOTAL: 5948 req messages >> > size time | ratio min max >> std >> > http1 3,460,925 0.18 | 1.00 1.00 1.00 >> 0.00 >> > delta2 (max_byte_size=4096) 707,901 11.87 | 0.20 0.03 0.83 >> 0.15 >> > headerdiff (buffer=4096) 960,106 1.65 | 0.28 0.01 0.96 >> 0.23 >> > >> > * TOTAL: 5948 res messages >> > size time | ratio min max >> std >> > http1 2,186,162 0.28 | 1.00 1.00 1.00 >> 0.00 >> > delta2 (max_byte_size=4096) 622,837 12.86 | 0.28 0.02 1.22 >> 0.13 >> > headerdiff (buffer=4096) 596,290 3.65 | 0.27 0.02 0.92 >> 0.18 >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >> > >> > >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 00:23:12 UTC