Re: Upgrade status for impl draft 1

Hi Mark,

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:56:09AM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> On 22/02/2013, at 6:02 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:
> 
> > I'm still having a problem with the principle behind 2b : when you
> > pass through transparent intercepting proxies, by definition you're
> > not aware of it. So even if 2a worked for the first connection, it
> > does not preclude that 2b will work for the second one. Nor the DNS
> > will BTW.
> 
> Sorry, I wasn't clear; that would be for cases where you had a high degree of
> confidence that not only was HTTP/2.0 able to be spoken, but where you have
> an even higher degree of confidence that HTTP/1.x is NOT; e.g., a separate
> port (that you might have discovered through DNS, for example).

Then if that's to be used on a different port, we probably don't need
to check how servers respond to this magic on port 80.

Willy

Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 03:54:58 UTC