- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:02:04 -0800
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 21 February 2013 15:54, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > I mean that SYN_STREAM has a priority, which is mandatory because without it > the browser won't trust the server-side to do the right thing. Yes. > SYN_REPLY doesn't have one, because it doesn't need to declare priority-- > the SYN_STREAM already did that, and it is almost always a waste to include > a priority field in SYN_REPLY. Agree. So what does SYN_REPLY actually do then? > I intend to consume a flag value which indicates that the semantic-frame is > longer than the current frame. The delta code already does this. I think I > stuck that in the SPDY/4 stuff (so it could be pulled from there, unless I'm > misremembering). A "To be continued..." flag sounds about right.
Received on Friday, 22 February 2013 00:02:31 UTC