On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>wrote: > On 2013-01-24 16:48, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > >> >> I am not very interested in the relative packing efficiency of a class >> of algorithms I don't want. I don't care how many bytes the compression >> saves on the wire if it requires me to pipeline my messages through a >> compression library. >> >> Anything that involves hash functions is going to be a non starter as >> far as I am concerned. >> > > Then I would recommend that you participate in the discussion about that > format; that's why we're having it. > Which is exactly what I was doing And I have been more than active in this conversation for your comments to be rather patronizing. I thought that the conversation was taking HTTP2.0 to a place that I think incompatible with good Web Services practice. People assured me that they want one protocol. I then stated that if they want one protocol the conversation is going in the wrong direction. I don't care how you polish the compression scheme, it is still going to be a compression scheme. -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2013 16:19:03 UTC