- From: ??? <willchan@chromium.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:49:53 -0800
- To: Robert Brewer <fumanchu@aminus.org>
- Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2013JanMar/0357.html On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Robert Brewer <fumanchu@aminus.org> wrote: > Roberto Peon wrote: >> The worst part is the high latency, especially given TCP's >> current cogestion avoidance implementations-- the total number >> of round-trips ends up dominating latency, regardless of how >> much bandwidth one has. > > Why is this being addressed by trying to make the messages smaller? Wouldn't following the original architecture of HTTP, which was optimized for fewer, larger messages, also reduce latency? > > > Robert Brewer > fumanchu@aminus.org
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 00:50:25 UTC