- From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:44:28 -0600
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > On 19/02/2013, at 3:26 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote: >>> HTTP 1.1 has a request/response pattern. This covers 90% of needs but means >>> that if the protocol is followed correctly forces a round trip delay on each >>> content request. Which of course leads to various browsers pushing the >>> envelope and pushing multiple requests out before responses have come back. >>> >>> With content streams this is not necessary of course... In fact that is >>> pretty much the purpose of having streams. >>> >>> Which suggests a need for a Multi-GET method to allow a request for a list >>> of content... >>> >>> If we had such a method then the format would be something like >>> >>> MGET <Common Headers> List <URI, Content header> >>> >>> And the typical communication pattern of a browser would be: >>> >>> GET /toplevel.html >>> MGET </image1.jpg /image2.jpg ...> >>> >>> Given this particular communication pattern which has an implicit delta >>> encoding, do we really need to worry about a separate delta encoding? >> >> The problem here is that the user-agent needs to get the top-level >> resource first, then it will know the names of the other resources. >> We can probably do better. > > Nico, > > If I understand you, you're talking about making some really fundamental changes to the Web Architecture, which is squarely out of the WG's charter. Is Phillip's proposal also out of charter? > I don't mind discussing ideas and understanding how we got here, so long as they don't distract from our work. I get the feeling that this is starting to happen. > > Again, if you have a proposal, please write it up in detail and make it to the WG; endlessly discussing the minutia of a half-formed idea is not a productive use of anyone's time. I... posted twice on this, within minutes. Nico --
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2013 04:44:51 UTC