w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from January to March 2002 by author

Al Gilman

• Re: visual and auditory navigation: examples needed (Sunday, 31 March)
• Re: zoom tool-tips (Sunday, 31 March)
• Re: word comprhension (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: word comprhension (Thursday, 28 March)
• server-side diversity is OK, <big IF/> (Sunday, 3 March)
• source + try harder as an option (Friday, 1 March)
• spec-waving Philistines [was: RE: Conclusions from Discussion today] (Friday, 22 February)
• is the needed proxy available? etc. (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Friday, 1 February)
• search as an access asset (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 (Saturday, 26 January)
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 (Friday, 25 January)
• data error recovery, data persistence, and LD access to forms transactions (Wednesday, 9 January)
• rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Please review Requirements for WCAG 2.0 (deadline 18 January) (Friday, 4 January)

Andi Snow-Weaver

• Regrets (Thursday, 28 February)
• 31 January 2002 WCAG WG minutes   (Friday, 1 February)
• Late regrets for 1/17/02 (Thursday, 17 January)
• Regrets for Jan 03, 2002 (Thursday, 3 January)

Andrew C. Wiss

• Request to jon WAI working group (Monday, 4 February)

Andrew McFarland

• RE: CSS versus tables (Wednesday, 2 January)
• RE: CSS versus tables (Wednesday, 2 January)

Annuska Perkins

• RE: regrets (Thursday, 28 March)
• RE: action item for the testability of 3.5 (annotating complex information) (Thursday, 14 March)
• regrets (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: Agenda (Wednesday, 13 February)
• REGRETS (Thursday, 7 February)
• action item for the testability of 3.5 (annotating complex information) (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: partial regrets (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: event handlers Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Friday, 4 January)

Bailey, Bruce

• RE: rationalize presentation (Thursday, 17 January)

Ben Caldwell

• Request to join (Wednesday, 13 February)

Bob Regan

• RE: Questions from Face to Face (Thursday, 28 March)
• Questions from Face to Face (Tuesday, 26 March)
• RE: 3.3 action ! (Sunday, 3 February)

BottomsupCo@aol.com

• Re: Active Participants Listing (Wednesday, 23 January)

by way of Wendy A Chisholm

• W3C Weekly News - 25 March 2002 (Thursday, 28 March)
• Request to Join (Friday, 22 March)
• W3C Weekly News - 18 March 2002 (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Multiple versions of a page (Friday, 8 March)
• W3C Weekly News - 4 March 2002 (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Checkpoint 4.2 Review (Tuesday, 19 February)
• W3C Weekly News - 18 February 2002 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• W3C Weekly News - 11 February 2002 (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html (Tuesday, 5 February)
• /colour/colourblindness.html (Tuesday, 5 February)
• W3C Weekly News - 4 February 2002 (Monday, 4 February)
• Re Please review Requirements for WCAG 2.0 (deadline 18 January) (Friday, 18 January)

Charles F. Munat

• Re: text as images... (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: text as images... (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: text as images... (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Steal this post [was: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation]] (Thursday, 10 January)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Monday, 1 April)
• Re: visual and auditory navigation: examples needed (Sunday, 31 March)
• Re: F2F notes for discussion of illustrating text checkpoint (Sunday, 31 March)
• Re: F2F notes for discussion of illustrating text checkpoint (Sunday, 31 March)
• Re: visual and auditory navigation: examples needed (Sunday, 31 March)
• RE: Questions from Face to Face (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: word comprhension (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: word comprhension (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: Questions from Face to Face (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: question re WCAG 1.0 (Tuesday, 26 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Tuesday, 26 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Saturday, 23 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: SVG techniques (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility (Monday, 18 March)
• Art and unchangeable text Re: More useful information for 3.3 (Friday, 15 March)
• SVG techniques (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: Audience (was Re: More useful information for 3.3) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: More useful information for 3.3 (Thursday, 14 March)
• RE: Sign language equivalents (Tuesday, 12 March)
• RE: Sign language equivalents (Tuesday, 12 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Sign language equivalents (Tuesday, 12 March)
• RE: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: Reconsidering the wording of our main guidelines (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: regrets (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: Page Size (kb), line speed and accessibility (no checkpoint number) (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Monday, 18 February)
• RE: Interesting new assistive tech (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: Agenda (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: Fwd: W3C Weekly News - 11 February 2002 (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: Objective Views 3.3 (Wednesday, 6 February)
• RE: text as images... (Wednesday, 6 February)
• RE: text as images... (Monday, 4 February)
• RE: Dumb Thought on alt Text (or Smart Thought?) (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: Dumb Thought on alt Text (or Smart Thought?) (Sunday, 3 February)
• longish response RE: 3.3 action ! (Sunday, 3 February)
• RE: text as images... (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Friday, 1 February)
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Friday, 1 February)
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Friday, 1 February)
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Thursday, 31 January)
• [glossary] Re: 24 January 2002 WCAG WG minutes - Definition of Normative (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: WCAG1 10.3 (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Monday, 28 January)
• text as images... (Thursday, 24 January)
• RE: level A and double A (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Why navbars are important (Tuesday, 22 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: level A and double A (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Monday, 21 January)
• level A and double A RE: rationalize presentation (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Sunday, 20 January)
• checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation (Sunday, 20 January)
• Re: Re Please review Requirements for WCAG 2.0 (deadline 18 January) (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Wednesday, 16 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names? (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: The Order of Checkpoint Priorities (Tuesday, 8 January)
• RE: event handlers Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Sunday, 6 January)
• Implementing CC/PP Re: A single URI (Sunday, 6 January)
• Different entry methods Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Friday, 4 January)
• event handlers Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Friday, 4 January)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 3 January)
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Thursday, 3 January)
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Thursday, 3 January)
• RE: CSS versus tables (Wednesday, 2 January)
• RE: CSS versus tables (Tuesday, 1 January)
• RE: ems versus pixels (Tuesday, 1 January)
• Re: ems versus pixels (Tuesday, 1 January)
• Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) (Tuesday, 1 January)
• RE: CSS versus tables (Tuesday, 1 January)
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Tuesday, 1 January)

Chuck Hitchcock

• RE: Sign language equivalents (Wednesday, 13 March)

Chuck Letourneau

• Re: question re WCAG 1.0 (Wednesday, 27 March)

Cynthia Shelly

• I'll be 1/2 hour late for tomorrow's meeting (Wednesday, 20 March)
• my action item: 4.1, 4.2 & 4.4 (Wednesday, 20 March)
• RE: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility (Tuesday, 19 March)
• regrets for at least half of today's call (Thursday, 14 March)
• RE: Agenda (Thursday, 7 March)
• RE: Conclusions from Discussion today (Friday, 22 February)
• RE: Agenda (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Interesting new assistive tech (Friday, 8 February)
• regrets for the rest of the meeting (Thursday, 7 February)
• RE: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Thursday, 7 February)
• RE: is the needed proxy available? etc. (Friday, 1 February)
• regrets for (most of) tomorrow's meeting (Wednesday, 23 January)
• regrets for today's meeting <eom> (Thursday, 17 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Wednesday, 16 January)
• RE: NOtes from GL meeting 12/10/02 (Friday, 11 January)

Danny Roush

• WCAG 2.0 and non-text equivalents (Monday, 18 February)

Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo

• Re: WCAG 2 Restructuring Proposal comments (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: More useful information for 3.3 (Wednesday, 13 March)

Eric Velleman

• Re: visual and auditory navigation: examples needed (Thursday, 28 March)

Geoff Deering

• Apologies (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Apologies (Tuesday, 5 February)
• RE: suggestions for where working group members can get involved (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: text as images... (Thursday, 24 January)
• RE: level A and double A RE: rationalize presentation (Thursday, 24 January)
• RE: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: Agenda (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: Active Participants Listing (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: level A and double A (Tuesday, 22 January)
• RE: level A and double A RE: rationalize presentation (Tuesday, 22 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Tuesday, 22 January)
• RE: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Saturday, 19 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Wednesday, 9 January)
• RE: The Order of Checkpoint Priorities (Tuesday, 8 January)
• RE: The Order of Checkpoint Priorities (Tuesday, 8 January)
• The Order of Checkpoint Priorities (Tuesday, 8 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Tuesday, 8 January)

gian@stanleymilford.com.au

• meeting (Wednesday, 27 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Wednesday, 20 March)
• RE: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility (Wednesday, 20 March)
• RE: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility (Tuesday, 19 March)
• RE: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility (Monday, 18 March)
• FW: minutes (Tuesday, 12 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Friday, 8 March)
• minutes (Thursday, 7 March)
• RE: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: Reconsidering the wording of our main guidelines (Friday, 1 March)
• many apologies (Thursday, 21 February)
• RE: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Thursday, 7 February)
• RE: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Wednesday, 6 February)
• RE: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Wednesday, 6 February)
• RE: text as images... (Wednesday, 6 February)
• RE: /colour/colourblindness.html (Tuesday, 5 February)
• RE: text as images... (Tuesday, 5 February)
• RE: Dumb Thought on alt Text (or Smart Thought?) (Monday, 4 February)
• Post regrets (Monday, 4 February)
• RE: text as images... (Monday, 4 February)
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Wednesday, 30 January)
• RE: WCAG1 10.3 (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Friday, 25 January)
• FW: text as images... (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: text as images... (Friday, 25 January)
• RE: WG charter & text as images (Wednesday, 23 January)
• WG charter (Wednesday, 23 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Monday, 14 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Use consistent presentation (Friday, 4 January)

goliver@accease.com

• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 14 March)
• What is disability? (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: More useful information for 3.3 (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: Agenda - More useful information for 3.3 (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 7 March)
• Useful Reference for 3.3 (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re : NEW Checkpoint 4.S.1 (taken from S-1. Goes in Section 4. ) (Sunday, 3 March)
• RE: Reconsidering the wording of our main guidelines (Saturday, 2 March)
• 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Sunday, 24 February)
• Page Size (kb), line speed and accessibility (no checkpoint number) (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Suggested Benefit) (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Accessibility and Usability (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: suggestions for where working group members can get involved (Sunday, 27 January)
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 (Sunday, 27 January)
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 (Sunday, 27 January)
• Re: suggestions for where working group members can get involved (Friday, 25 January)
• Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: OTHER CONTRIBUTORS (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: 24 January 2002 WCAG WG minutes - Definition of Normative (Friday, 25 January)

Gregg Vanderheiden

• RE: Questions from Face to Face (Tuesday, 26 March)
• RE: WCAG 2 Restructuring Proposal comments (Tuesday, 26 March)
• NOT new WCAG 2.0 doc -- New WCAG 2.0 Proposal Doc (Saturday, 23 March)
• New WCAG 2.0 Doc (Saturday, 23 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Regrets (Thursday, 14 March)
• REGRETS (Thursday, 7 March)
• RE: NEW Checkpoint 4.S.1 (taken from S-1. Goes in Section 4. ) (Thursday, 21 February)
• NEW Checkpoint 4.S.1 (taken from S-1. Goes in Section 4. ) (Friday, 15 February)
• FW: Conclusions from Discussion today (Friday, 15 February)
• RE: Interesting new assistive tech (Friday, 15 February)
• REQUEST -- include checkpoint number somewhere in your Subject Line (Friday, 15 February)
• Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Regrets (Wednesday, 6 February)
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: OTHER CONTRIBUTORS (Monday, 28 January)
• RE: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 (Monday, 28 January)
• Accessibility and Usability (Monday, 28 January)
• OTHER CONTRIBUTORS (Friday, 25 January)
• Members in Good Standing (Thursday, 24 January)
• Active Participants Listing (Tuesday, 22 January)
• NOtes from GL meeting 12/10/02 (Friday, 11 January)
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Friday, 4 January)
• Agenda (Thursday, 3 January)

Jan Eric Hellbusch

• AW: transparency of black? drop-down menu (Tuesday, 1 January)

Jason White

• Agenda (Wednesday, 27 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Saturday, 23 March)
• No meeting tomorrow (Wednesday, 20 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Saturday, 16 March)
• Conformance dimension: technology support (Friday, 15 March)
• Audience (was Re: More useful information for 3.3) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: More useful information for 3.3 (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Agenda (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Agenda (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Checkpoint 4.3 action item (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Agenda (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Agenda (Tuesday, 5 February)
• RE: is the needed proxy available? etc. (Saturday, 2 February)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Points to consider in writing success criteria (Saturday, 26 January)
• Re: suggestions for where working group members can get involved (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: action item for the testability of 3.5 (annotating complex information) (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 23 January)
• "Until User Agents" in WCAG techniques for 2.0 (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: WCAG1 10.2 (until user agents) (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: WCAG1 10.2 (until user agents) (Friday, 18 January)
• Checkpoint 3.2 (Friday, 18 January)
• Agenda (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names? (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Agenda (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Tuesday, 1 January)
• Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) (Tuesday, 1 January)

Jenae Andershonis

• Regrets for 2/21/02 (Thursday, 21 February)

Jim Ley

• Re: Conclusions from Discussion today (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: action item for the testability of 3.5 (annotating complex information) (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Friday, 25 January)
• Review of WCAG 2.0 checkpoint 4.4 (Thursday, 24 January)
• Review of WCAG 2.0 checkpoint 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 (Thursday, 24 January)
• Review of WCAG 2.0 checkpoint 2.2,2.3,2.5 and 2.7 (Thursday, 24 January)
• Review of WCAG 2.0 checkpoint 1.1 (and 2 a bit) (Thursday, 24 January)
• Review of WCAG 2.0 Intro and checkpoint 1.5 (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Open Issue 77 ? (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: transparency of black? drop-down menu (Wednesday, 2 January)
• Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) (Tuesday, 1 January)

Jo Miller

• regrets (Thursday, 28 March)
• regrets? (Thursday, 14 March)
• RE: More useful information for 3.3 (Thursday, 14 March)
• More useful information for 3.3 (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: Useful Reference for 3.3 (Monday, 11 March)
• Checkpoint 3.3 (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: Checkpoint 3.3 (Thursday, 28 February)
• Checkpoint 3.3 (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 3.3 Research (Sunday, 10 February)
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names, proposal (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: Agenda - regrets (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names, proposal (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names? (Tuesday, 15 January)
• minutes of 3 January 2002 Telecon (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Please review Requirements for WCAG 2.0 (deadline 18 January) (Tuesday, 1 January)

Joe Clark

• Re: Questions from Face to Face (Wednesday, 27 March)
• WCAG 2 Restructuring Proposal comments (Monday, 25 March)

jonathan chetwynd

• Re: zoom tool-tips (Sunday, 31 March)
• zoom tool-tips (Sunday, 31 March)
• Re: visual and auditory navigation: examples needed (Sunday, 31 March)
• Re: word comprhension (Thursday, 28 March)
• visual and auditory navigation: examples needed (Thursday, 28 March)
• of musical notes -qq-dd- and telling a story. (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: More useful information for 3.3 (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: Sign language equivalents (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: Active Participants Listing (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: AW: transparency of black? drop-down menu (Wednesday, 2 January)
• transparency of positioned content was Re: transparency of black? drop-down menu (Wednesday, 2 January)
• transparency of black? drop-down menu (Tuesday, 1 January)

Jonathan O'Donnell

• Apologies (Thursday, 14 March)
• Apologies (Thursday, 14 February)
• Regrets (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: 3.3 action ! (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: 24 January 2002 WCAG WG minutes - Definition of Normative (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names? (Tuesday, 15 January)

Katie Haritos-Shea

• Clarifications on Questions from Face to Face............. (Wednesday, 27 March)
• REGRETS (Thursday, 7 February)
• REGRETS (Thursday, 31 January)
• Regrets (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: Use consistent presentation (Friday, 4 January)

Kynn Bartlett

• Regrets (Thursday, 28 March)
• RE: Questions from Face to Face (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: WCAG 2 Restructuring Proposal comments (Tuesday, 26 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Wednesday, 20 March)
• W3C process (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: Conclusions from Discussion today (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 14 February)
• Fwd: W3C Weekly News - 11 February 2002 (Tuesday, 12 February)
• RE: Checkpoint 3.3 Research (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 3.3 Research (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 3.3 Research (Saturday, 9 February)
• Re: Interesting article: How to read W3C specs (Saturday, 9 February)
• Baseline Browser Characteristics (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html (Wednesday, 6 February)
• RE: text as images... (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: text as images... (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Regrets for 7 February (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Dumb Thought on alt Text (or Smart Thought?) (Saturday, 2 February)
• Re: text as images... (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: search as an access asset (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Active Participants Listing (Tuesday, 22 January)
• RE: level A and double A (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Active Participants Listing (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Active Participants Listing (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Active Participants Listing (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: level A and double A (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation (Monday, 21 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Sunday, 20 January)
• Re: WCAG1 10.2 (until user agents) (Friday, 18 January)
• WCAG1 10.2 (until user agents) (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names? (Tuesday, 15 January)

kynn-eda@idyllmtn.com

• Re: Agenda (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: Conclusions from Discussion today (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 (Sunday, 27 January)
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 (Sunday, 27 January)
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 (Saturday, 26 January)
• Re: WCAG1 10.3 (Saturday, 26 January)
• Re: level A and double A (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: checkpoint 3.1 RE: rationalize presentation (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Wednesday, 16 January)

Lee Otto

• RE: More useful information for 3.3 (Thursday, 14 March)
• Sign language equivalents (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Multiple versions of a page (Thursday, 7 March)

Lee Roberts

• Regrets (Thursday, 14 March)
• Regrets (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: 3.3 feedback (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: spec-waving Philistines [was: RE: Conclusions from Discussion today] (Friday, 22 February)
• RE: Conclusions from Discussion today (Friday, 22 February)
• Regrets (Thursday, 21 February)
• mail test (Tuesday, 12 February)
• RE: Checkpoint 3.3 Research (Monday, 11 February)
• Colorblindness (Sunday, 10 February)
• Checkpoint 3.3 Research (Sunday, 10 February)
• Checkpoint 3.3 Research (Saturday, 9 February)
• Regrets (Thursday, 7 February)
• RE: Objective Views 3.3 (Wednesday, 6 February)
• RE: /colour/colourblindness.html (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Objective Views 3.3 (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Request for advise for reporting (Sunday, 3 February)
• RE: text as images... (Sunday, 3 February)
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Monday, 28 January)
• WCAG1 10.3 (Saturday, 26 January)
• RE: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 (Saturday, 26 January)
• Regrets (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: Active Participants Listing (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Regrets (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Request to Join (Wednesday, 16 January)

Lisa Seeman

• Re: action item for the testability of 3.5 (annotating complexinformation) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: More useful information for 3.3 (Thursday, 14 March)
• Fw: Checkpoint 3.3 (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Fw: Checkpoint 3.3 (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Fw: Checkpoint 3.3 (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: minutes (Sunday, 10 March)
• Re: Multiple versions of a page (Friday, 8 March)
• 3.3 feedback (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: Conclusions from Discussion today (Sunday, 24 February)
• Re: Conclusions from Discussion today (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: NEW Checkpoint 4.S.1 (taken from S-1. Goes in Section 4. ) (Friday, 22 February)
• Fw: Feedback on accessibility techniques for cognitive disabilities (Thursday, 21 February)
• Fw: accessibility for cognitive disabilities (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 3.3 Research (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 3.3 Research (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: 3.3 action ! (Monday, 4 February)
• Fw: 3.3 action ! (Monday, 4 February)
• 3.3 action item (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: FAQ plan (Wednesday, 16 January)
• lots on agenda (Thursday, 10 January)
• my two cents on minutes of 3 January 2002 Telecon (Wednesday, 9 January)

Loretta Guarino Reid

• Re: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: 'Non-economic' rationale for backward compatibility (Friday, 1 March)
• Minutes from Feb. 28, 2002 (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: 21 February 2002 - WCAG WG Minutes (Thursday, 21 February)
• Minutes from Feb 7, 2002 (Saturday, 9 February)
• 4.1 action item (Tuesday, 22 January)
• minutes from 17 January (Friday, 18 January)

Lori L. Paparteys

• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: regrets (Thursday, 28 February)
• Regrets (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: Agenda (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: Active Participants Listing (Tuesday, 22 January)

Marja-Riitta Koivunen

• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Sunday, 24 March)
• Re: of musical notes -qq-dd- and telling a story. (Friday, 15 March)

Mark Stimson

• regrets (Thursday, 28 March)
• question re WCAG 1.0 (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Leaving a tad early today (Thursday, 14 March)
• Regrets and info on action item (Thursday, 7 February)
• Regrets (Thursday, 17 January)
• partial regrets (Thursday, 10 January)

Matt May

• Re: zoom tool-tips (Sunday, 31 March)
• Re: comments 1, 3 and 6 (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: comments 1, 3 and 6 (Thursday, 21 March)
• New WCAG 2 HTML techniques document posted (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Wednesday, 6 February)
• CSS and downlevel browsers was Re: text as images... (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: text as images... (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: text as images... (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: The Order of Checkpoint Priorities (Tuesday, 8 January)

Nick Kew

• Discussion: How to weight different accessibility warnings? (fwd) (Monday, 11 February)

Paul Bohman

• One sentence summary of WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 28 March)
• RE: Agenda (Thursday, 7 March)
• RE: Reconsidering the wording of our main guidelines (Friday, 1 March)
• RE: Agenda (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: Reconsidering the wording of our main guidelines (Friday, 22 February)
• Reconsidering the wording of our main guidelines (Friday, 22 February)
• Regrets (Thursday, 31 January)

PERRY, Grant

• RE: CSS versus tables (Wednesday, 2 January)

phoenixl

• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Tuesday, 26 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Tuesday, 26 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Monday, 25 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Sunday, 24 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Sunday, 24 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Saturday, 23 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Saturday, 23 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Saturday, 23 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Saturday, 23 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Saturday, 16 March)
• Re: Multiple versions of a page (Friday, 8 March)
• RE: Multiple versions of a page (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Multiple versions of a page (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: server-side diversity is OK, <big IF/> (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: Re : NEW Checkpoint 4.S.1 (taken from S-1. Goes in Section 4. ) (Monday, 4 March)
• Re: source + try harder as an option (Sunday, 3 March)
• RE: NEW Checkpoint 4.S.1 (taken from S-1. Goes in Section 4. ) (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: NEW Checkpoint 4.S.1 (taken from S-1. Goes in Section 4. ) (Friday, 15 February)

Robert Neff

• RE: comments 1, 3 and 6 (Thursday, 21 March)
• Comment 6 - Code used an example (Thursday, 21 March)
• Comment 5 -Form Controls (Thursday, 21 March)
• Comment 5 -Form Controls (Thursday, 21 March)
• Comment 7 - Linearizing Table versus Table for Layout (Thursday, 21 March)
• Comment 4 - Access keys (Thursday, 21 March)
• RE: New WCAG 2 HTML techniques document posted (Thursday, 21 March)
• RE: New WCAG 2 HTML techniques document posted (Thursday, 21 March)
• RE: New WCAG 2 HTML techniques document posted (Thursday, 21 March)

rosie@www.ssbtechnologies.com

• Automated reply from rosie@www.ssbtechnologies.com (Monday, 18 February)

Rowan Smith

• RE: ems versus pixels (Tuesday, 1 January)

Scott Luebking

• RE: CSS versus tables (Tuesday, 1 January)
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Tuesday, 1 January)
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Tuesday, 1 January)
• Re: A little back to basics (Re: Users should have (Re: Fresh start? Re: Minimal Browser Capabilities)) (Tuesday, 1 January)
• RE: Multiple versions of a web page (Tuesday, 1 January)

Sean B. Palmer

• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 (Monday, 28 January)

Slaydon, Eugenia

• RE: Agenda - Regrets (Thursday, 14 March)
• RE: Sign language equivalents (Tuesday, 12 March)
• RE: Sign language equivalents (Tuesday, 12 March)
• RE: Agenda - Regrets (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: Checkpoint 4.4 Review (Suggested Benefit) (Monday, 18 February)
• RE: suggestions for where working group members can get involved. (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: suggestions for where working group members can get involved. (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: suggestions for where working group members can get involved. (Tuesday, 29 January)
• RE: 4.1 action item (Tuesday, 22 January)
• RE: Active Participants Listing (Tuesday, 22 January)
• RE: Active Participants Listing (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Regrets (Thursday, 17 January)
• RE: [CSS-TECHS] drop caps, :first-letter (Wednesday, 16 January)
• RE: [CSS-TECHS] drop caps, :first-letter (Wednesday, 16 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Tuesday, 15 January)
• RE: rationalize presentation [was: Use consistent presentation] (Thursday, 10 January)
• RE: CSS versus tables (Wednesday, 2 January)
• RE: CSS versus tables (Wednesday, 2 January)

Steven.Faulkner@visionaustralia.org.au

• word comprhension (Thursday, 28 March)

Wendy A Chisholm

• Re: F2F notes for discussion of illustrating text checkpoint (Sunday, 31 March)
• F2F notes for discussion of illustrating text checkpoint (Friday, 29 March)
• Minutes from F2F (Friday, 29 March)
• Minutes - 28 March 2002 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: question re WCAG 1.0 (Thursday, 28 March)
• Location details of F2F meetings (Saturday, 23 March)
• 14 March 2002 telecon minutes (Thursday, 14 March)
• Phone info, Updated agenda added to meeting page for 23/24 March F2F (Thursday, 7 March)
• HTML Techniques Issues List - Thanks, Andi (Thursday, 7 March)
• minutes available in HTML (Friday, 1 March)
• regrets (Thursday, 28 February)
• 21 February 2002 - WCAG WG Minutes (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: Checkpoint 4.3 action item (Thursday, 21 February)
• Valentine's Day WCAG WG minutes (Thursday, 14 February)
• Interesting article: How to read W3C specs (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: /colour/colourblindness.html (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: Request for advise for reporting (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Defn of Normative (was: Re: 24 January 2002 WCAG WG minutes - Definition of Normative) (Tuesday, 5 February)
• March F2F registration is open until 15 March 2002 (Tuesday, 5 February)
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Friday, 1 February)
• RE: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Thursday, 31 January)
• RE: suggestions for where working group members can get involved. (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: suggestions for where working group members can get involved. (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Fwd: W3C Weekly News - 28 January 2002 (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC (Monday, 28 January)
• Next F2F meeting: 23-24 March, L.A., California, USA (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: action item for the testability of 3.5 (annotating complex information) (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Request for clarity on Consensus Item G1 (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: suggestions for where working group members can get involved (Friday, 25 January)
• suggestions for where working group members can get involved (Thursday, 24 January)
• 24 January 2002 WCAG WG minutes (Thursday, 24 January)
• RE: level A and double A RE: rationalize presentation (Thursday, 24 January)
• RE: 4.1 action item (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: text as images... (Thursday, 24 January)
• W3C Weekly News - 21 January 2002 (Wednesday, 23 January)
• W3C Weekly News (22 December 2001 - 14 January 2002) (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: Open Issue 77 ? (Wednesday, 23 January)
• Re: Active Participants Listing (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Balancing consistency and differences (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: 3.3 action item (Friday, 18 January)
• Recognized media types for checkpoint 3.2 (Thursday, 17 January)
• [CSS-TECHS] Issues list (was: Issues since 9/20/00) (Wednesday, 16 January)
• RE: [CSS-TECHS] drop caps, :first-letter (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [CSS-TECHS] drop caps, :first-letter (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names, proposal (Wednesday, 16 January)
• FAQ plan (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [CSS-TECHS] numbers instead of names? (Monday, 14 January)
• minutes from 10 january (Thursday, 10 January)
• regrets (Thursday, 3 January)

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2002 22:53:12 UTC