- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 01:33:23 -0500 (EST)
- To: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@sonic.net>
- cc: <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I suspect that universal will not often be accomplished, because people won't take the time to ensure that everyone is catered for in all circumstances. But many people will do their best to do so, and an important part of that is providing a semantically rich version of content, so that the simple transformations people use a lot have something to work on, and those who are prepared to produce new and useful methods to transform content have something to work on. Chaals On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Scott Luebking wrote: Hi, I tend to believe that "universal" will not be accomplished because there will always be some individuals where their needs are so complex and conflicting that they won't be able to be addressed given resource limitations. I think I would give less priority to a semantically rich version because it doesn't seem that the number of people in the general disabled community who get into transformations would justify th expenditure of resource. Scott
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2002 01:33:28 UTC