W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: Checkpoint 4.4 Review

From: <goliver@accease.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 03:46:13 -0800 (PST)
To: charles@w3.org
Cc: GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-Id: <20020218034615.29256.c000-h006.c000.wm@mail.accease.com.criticalpath.net>
Yeah
That's why I suggested steering clear of that
altogether (using 'default').
My suggested wording for the checkpoint being

'Ensure that all content remains available when
stylistic and scripting technologies are not supported
or are turned off.'

Cheers
Graham



On Mon, 18 February 2002, Charles McCathieNevile wrote

> 
> Because that is what we really mean when we are
trying to define "default
> installation", I think.
> 
> cheers
> 
> Chaals
> 
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 goliver@accease.com wrote:
> 
>   Hi Charles
> 
>   > Basically I agree with Graham, but I don't think
we
>   can really sort this out
>   > without resolution on baseline requirements.
> 
>   Why?
> 
>   Cheers
>   Graham
> 
>   AccEase Ltd : Making on-line information accessible
>   Phone : +64 9 846 6995
>   Email : goliver@accease.com
> 
> 
> -- 
> Charles McCathieNevile   
http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
> W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    
http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
> Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011,
Australia
> (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902
Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)

AccEase Ltd : Making on-line information accessible
Phone : +64 9 846 6995
Email : goliver@accease.com
Received on Monday, 18 February 2002 06:46:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:18 GMT