W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: Page Size (kb), line speed and accessibility (no checkpoint number)

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:56:08 -0500 (EST)
To: <goliver@accease.com>
cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0202181753010.10477-100000@tux.w3.org>
In WCAG 1.0 the reason was that this is a general issue which doesn't affect
people with disabilities much more than it does everyone else, overall. (56k
modems are common in Australia, but 56k connections - i.e. the ISP having a
56k modem running at the other end) are rare. 9600 is something I use a fair
bit.

But the basic answer is that these are general design issues,which don't have
a great impact on disability in particular, as I recall the decisions of the
group.

cheers

Chaals

On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 goliver@accease.com wrote:

  Why don't we cover page size (and the related issue of
  page design and its impact on page download time) in
  the guidelines and the resultant impact on
  accessibility?
  For example, I was recently faced with a site with
  several 1mb pages (only 5% of which was images!).
  The page was virtually impossible to use on my 56.6k
  modem, never mind anyone who accesses using 9.6, 14.4
  or 28.8 (all of which are common in NZ).

  TIA
  Graham

  AccEase Ltd : Making on-line information accessible
  Phone : +64 9 846 6995
  Email : goliver@accease.com


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Monday, 18 February 2002 17:56:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:18 GMT