At 5:29 AM -0500 1/21/02, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >Here is a statement of personal opinion: you should be aiming for at least >double-A conformance to WCAG, as the lowest level to provide something >aproaching equal access for everyone. (I realise it isn't a perfect >statement, because the guidelines are not perfect. But for a defined target >it is as close as I can get in one sentence). My personal opinion: What you should aim for is less dependent on what (arbitrary) categories certain checkpoints were put into, and more dependent upon your content, your audience, and your ability to meet the requirements of various checkpoints. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain http://idyllmtn.com Web Accessibility Expert-for-hire http://kynn.com/resume January Web Accessibility eCourse http://kynn.com/+d201 Forthcoming: Teach Yourself CSS in 24 HoursReceived on Monday, 21 January 2002 13:54:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:18 GMT