W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: Objective Views 3.3

From: Lee Roberts <leeroberts@roserockdesign.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 06:33:51 -0600
To: "WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NFBBJHFEOLAGEICMIMBPIEMDCBAA.leeroberts@roserockdesign.com>
The book that I used is a reference book used for English Composition and
Writing Skills.  Every book that I have ever had on the subject presents the
information in the same manner.  That's the really good thing about books on
writing - the are consistent with each other.  There is no biase in their
writings and the information is based upon standards that don't change
simply because someone does not agree with them or thinks they should be

I hope this helps.

Lee Roberts

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Charles McCathieNevile
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:45 AM
To: Lee Roberts
Cc: WCAG List
Subject: Re: Objective Views 3.3

Is this book based on some kind of research, or is it just "good ideas from
someone"? (I realise that for all the things I have proposed for this
checkpoint, I don't think I have pointed to a single piece  of research that
backs them up.)



On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Lee Roberts wrote:

  ACTION: lr to look into research on objective conditions for the proposed
  success criteria.

  Handbook for Writers, Second Edition
  Author: Lynn Quitman Troyka
  copyright: 1990

Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2002 09:33:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:40 UTC