W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: Multiple versions of a page

From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:35:53 -0800
Message-Id: <a0510101fb8bebee94fac@[10.0.1.3]>
To: <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 1:32 AM -0600 3/20/02, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
>I LIKE server side tuning for different combinations of the above.  But
>unless we have a very sophisticated means to ask, discuss, negotiate and
>come up with the right combination of features ---- for all browsers (or
>a vast majority )  then we need  to have a default, cross disability
>accessible version --- don’t we?

Definitely, but keep in mind that those are no more likely to solve the
problems of multiple disabilities than anything else. We need to be
careful not to think that a single "accessible" version is a magic
bullet. The problem of complex disability needs still exists no matter
how many versions you have. Restricting yourself to one (as some would
do) is less of a solution than adding 5 more to that one.

--Kynn

-- 
Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>                 http://kynn.com
Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain            http://idyllmtn.com
Next Book: Teach Yourself CSS in 24       http://cssin24hours.com
Kynn on Web Accessibility ->>          http://kynn.com/+sitepoint
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 17:36:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:18 GMT