W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: Resolutions on Changes to REQUIREMENTS DOC

From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 11:26:26 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020128112539.04c63280@localhost>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, Gregg Vanderheiden <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>
Cc: "GLWAI Guidelines WG (GL - WAI Guidelines WG)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Charles,

Do you feel we need to address this fuzziness before publishing the document this Thursday?

--wendy

>  S1 - Serving content in different forms in order to meet different user
>  needs or preferences is an acceptable way to comply with the guidelines,
>  --  as long as equivalents for all of the information are provided in
>  the different forms, and it is all available from the same URI.
>  (Accessible, findable links to alternate form(s) is allowed.) (Server
>  side solutions are acceptable - as specified.)
>
>CMN This still seems unclear to me as a way of phrasing what we mean. Does it
>mean every version must be content-negotiated, to keep the URI the same (in
>parctice this doesn't work with existing systems, where a specific version
>can come from a generic, content-negotiated URI, or can come from a specific
>version URI), or does it mean that it must be possible (easy?) to get from
>one version to another by some means?
>
>I therefore propose that we mark this as an issue still open until we can
>produce (or the editors can propose) some wording that seems less fuzzy
>
>Charles McCN 

-- 
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium 
web accessibility initiative
seattle, wa usa
/--
Received on Monday, 28 January 2002 11:23:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:18 GMT