W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: level A and double A RE: rationalize presentation

From: Geoff Deering <gdeering@acslink.net.au>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 09:05:38 +1100
To: "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>
Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NBBBJPNFCLNLAADCLFJBKELKDEAA.gdeering@acslink.net.au>
If you ask which sections I would like to work on, can you please send me a
list of the sections that require work so I can choose which ones I may be
best fit for?

If it is more open ended, I would like to write something concerned with
this thread.  My concern is the interpretation of what is A, AA, and AAA
compliant.  I am quite concerned that the novice, new to WAI, or with some
passion or interest, wants to embrace it's best of practice, goes and looks
at all the sites that are strongly associated with the W3C WAI movement, and
forms an observation from close discernment which is not the "Best of
Practice".  Often this alienates good people, and we need to be rigorous and
disciplined enough to be able to show best of practice in our own work, and
also to be able to show the huge business advantages from doing so.

I am willing to write clarifying documentation on this, test suites,
examples, whatever, but most of all, it may be more important, at this
stage, to be concentrating on what the priority work at hand is, so I leave
it to you and Charles to make suggestions as to what the priorities are, and
what they need?

Geoff Deering


-----Original Message-----
From: Wendy A Chisholm [mailto:wendy@w3.org]
Sent: Friday, 25 January 2002 7:54 AM
To: gdeering@acslink.net.au
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: level A and double A RE: rationalize presentation

Agreed. Which sections would you like to work on?
--w

At 02:29 PM 1/22/02, Geoff Deering wrote:
>I agree with this.  The success in the communication and impact of the
>future release of WCAG2, I feel, will depend on such clarifying
>documentation, Test Suites, and examples.
>
>Geoff
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:charles@w3.org]
>Sent: Monday, 21 January 2002 9:30 PM
>To: Geoff Deering
>Cc: WAI GL
>Subject: level A and double A RE: rationalize presentation
>
>
>        [snip]
>There is a lack of detail available from teh techniques documents in some
>areas, and it
>would be helpful to have a lot more specific examples of what does or does
>not meet a checkpoint and why - working group consensus on annotations to a
>Test Suite would be a good start. I feel that this  is a real problem
>inhibiting implementation (as opposed to adoption in policy) of the
>guidelines, and one that we as a working group should be resolving.
>
>Chaals
>
>[snip]

--
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
seattle, wa usa
/--
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2002 17:05:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:18 GMT