public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from October to December 2004 by author

Alberto Reggiori

• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG 7 Dec (in progress) (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: DESCRIBE - description of a resource (Thursday, 25 November)
• DESCRIBE - description of a resource (Monday, 22 November)
• regrets (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 9 Nov (Tuesday, 9 November)
• literals as numbers (Was: Re: Comments on SPARQL draft) (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-11-02 for review (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: Comments in SPARQL (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: use a QName as variable identifier (Monday, 1 November)
• use a QName as variable identifier (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: Simple source tests (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: test case details by 26 Oct telcon (Tuesday, 26 October)
• towards automation of DAWG tests machinery (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 26 Oct (Tuesday, 26 October)
• some real-world SOURCE test cases (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: minutes for 10-12-2004 meeting (Tuesday, 19 October)
• regrets for telcon 2004-10-12 (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: UC&R ready for review (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: Named Containers : a framework for aggregation and query (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: UC&R ready for review (Monday, 4 October)

Dan Connolly

• specify the language without reference to implementation; keep inference orthogonal (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (Wednesday, 22 December)
• DAWG ftf5 and W3C tech plenary registration (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: F2F4 information (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: UNSAID + inference tests (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Abstract protocol URIs (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Abstract protocol URIs (Tuesday, 21 December)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Dec 2004 (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) (Sunday, 19 December)
• Re: UNSAID drafted and mapped to SQL (Sunday, 19 December)
• Re: Small items for SPARQL (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Scribe apology (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: query parameter name clashes? (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Small items for SPARQL (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• RE: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (Tuesday, 14 December)
• SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? (Tuesday, 14 December)
• do-over on test approval (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Dec (minutes) (Tuesday, 14 December)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Dec (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review (Monday, 13 December)
• dependency on XQuery (Friday, 10 December)
• what does SPARQL stand for? (issues#languageProtocolName) (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: sparql protocol simplex updated (protocolRootReferent issue) (Thursday, 9 December)
• optional clauses: vivid test case (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: Fwd: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: apologies and regrets (and SPARQL definitions) (Tuesday, 7 December)
• [Fwd: Clothing for Finland] (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: Regrets for dawg 2004-12-07 telcon (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: alternative result format using collections - avoid use/mention issues (Monday, 6 December)
• agenda: RDF Data Access WG 7 Dec (Monday, 6 December)
• test case approval reflected in manifest? (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: scribe for tomorrow? (7 Dec) (Monday, 6 December)
• scribe for tomorrow? (7 Dec) (Monday, 6 December)
• agenda: RDF Data Access WG 7 Dec (in progress) (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: "entails" clearer than "subgraph" in defn Graph Pattern Match (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: feedback on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF", v1.139 (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Yoshio's review (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: let's approve 8 tests: triple-pattern-001 thru example-2-4a (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: Agenda/chair 30Nov (Monday, 29 November)
• Agenda/chair 30Nov (Monday, 29 November)
• let's approve 8 tests: triple-pattern-001 thru example-2-4a (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: DESCRIBE - description of a resource (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: protocol: updated (radically changed) draft (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: URIs in constraints, isBound, casting in eq (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: URIs in constraints, isBound, casting in eq (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: URIs in constraints, isBound, casting in eq (Monday, 22 November)
• are SOURCE consumers OK with it being optional? (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: Permanent model names in TKS/Kowari (Sunday, 21 November)
• URIs in constraints, isBound, casting in eq (Sunday, 21 November)
• puzzled by Query Solution defn (Saturday, 20 November)
• puzzled by Pattern Solution 2nd sentence (Saturday, 20 November)
• "entails" clearer than "subgraph" in defn Graph Pattern Match (Saturday, 20 November)
• let's allow the same terms everywhere, esp in triple patterns (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Thursday, 11 November)
• Helsinki DAWG ftf4: attendance planning (Wednesday, 10 November)
• RE: definitions for SELECT, projection, substitution [was: [Fwd: Re:...]] (Wednesday, 10 November)
• demo services, toys to play with: DawgShows 1/2 ;-) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: SOURCE - Choosing what to query and querying the origin of statements (Tuesday, 9 November)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 9 Nov (Monday, 8 November)
• agenda 9 Nov delayed (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: SPARQL grammar 2004-10-12 lex/yacc conflicts feedback (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: A present for Guy Fawkes night (Friday, 5 November)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 2 Nov (in progress; suggestions?) (Monday, 1 November)
• teleconferences in November (Monday, 1 November)
• 14:30Z, DAWG telcon, and you (Tuesday, 26 October)
• oops! didn't get back to disjunction (Tuesday, 26 October)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 26 Oct (Monday, 25 October)
• mail-speak [was: Draft: open issues around '?' use.] (Monday, 25 October)
• minutes: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct (non-IRC version) (Monday, 25 October)
• minutes: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct (irc log) (Friday, 22 October)
• RFE: sparql server (Friday, 22 October)
• test case details by 26 Oct telcon (Thursday, 21 October)
• input to WSDL, since we're using it in SPARQL? (Wednesday, 20 October)
• definitions for SELECT, projection, substitution [was: [Fwd: Re: ...]] (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: protocol draft -- update (Monday, 18 October)
• agenda: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: Simple source tests (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: Simple source tests (file: URIs in test materials) (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: Simple source tests (Thursday, 14 October)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 12 Aug (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Saturday, 2 October)
• Re: CBD - Concise Bounded Description - Member Submission from Nokia (Saturday, 2 October)
• Re: draft XML query results format spec (Friday, 1 October)
• Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement (Friday, 1 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Friday, 1 October)

Dave Beckett

• Re: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review (Monday, 20 December)
• Proposed replacement tests for those tests with ?foo, ?Bar (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: tests around comparators in the graph constraint (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Test cases for SOURCE and NAMED (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Updated DAWG variable binding results XML format (Monday, 13 December)
• non-XML format - Turtle document, for review (Monday, 13 December)
• SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: what does SPARQL stand for? (issues#languageProtocolName) (Saturday, 11 December)
• Re: "non-XML" RDF format (Thursday, 9 December)
• Regrets for dawg 2004-12-07 telcon (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Updated DAWG variable binding results XML format (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: Indicating bNodes in XML result sets (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: Issue with the result set format (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: are SOURCE consumers OK with it being optional? (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: let's allow the same terms everywhere, esp in triple patterns (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: protocol: updated (radically changed) draft (Wednesday, 24 November)
• regrets for dawg telcons 2004-11-23, 2004-11-30 (Friday, 19 November)
• Minutes of RDF DAWG teleconference 2004-11-09 for review (Wednesday, 10 November)
• SOURCE - Choosing what to query and querying the origin of statements (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: SPARQL grammar 2004-10-12 lex/yacc conflicts feedback (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: objecting to $ alone (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• SPARQL grammar 2004-10-12 lex/yacc conflicts feedback (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• commas or no commas (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• objecting to $ alone (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Comments in SPARQL (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Comments in SPARQL (Tuesday, 2 November)
• DAWG test manifests need classes for encoding file formats (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Rasqal with SPARQL (Monday, 25 October)
• SPARQL grammar 2004-10-12 lex/yacc conflicts feedback (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: Draft: open issues around '?' use. (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: Illustratation of prefix interaction details (Monday, 25 October)
• Illustratation of prefix interaction details (Monday, 25 October)
• SPARQL Query WD 20041012 examples (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: dawg-source-simple-* (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Thursday, 7 October)
• regrets for telcon 2004-10-12 (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Monday, 4 October)

Dirk-Willem van Gulik

• Re: objecting to $ alone (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: Comments in SPARQL (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: mail-speak [was: Draft: open issues around '?' use.] (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Draft: open issues around '?' use. (Monday, 25 October)
• Draft: open issues around '?' use. (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: UC&R ready for review (Tuesday, 5 October)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• data consistency tests with UNSAID and OPTIONAL (Tuesday, 21 December)
• tests around comparators in the graph constraint (Tuesday, 14 December)
• ACTION: EricP migrate some Algae UnionDisjunciton test cases (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: what does SPARQL stand for? (issues#languageProtocolName) (Saturday, 11 December)
• Re: UNSAID drafted and mapped to SQL (Saturday, 11 December)
• UNSAID drafted and mapped to SQL (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: "non-XML" RDF format (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: "non-XML" RDF format (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-12-07 for review (Thursday, 9 December)
• Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-12-07 for review (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 30 Nov (Tuesday, 30 November)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 30 Nov (Monday, 29 November)
• test cases play group (Monday, 29 November)
• relative URIs in RDF/XML (for test manifests) (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: Minutes of 2004-11-23 teleconference for review (Tuesday, 23 November)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 23 Nov (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: minutes and next week's meeting? (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: OUTER JOIN and DISJUNCTION (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: OUTER JOIN and DISJUNCTION (Monday, 15 November)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 16 Nov (Monday, 15 November)
• OUTER JOIN and DISJUNCTION (Monday, 15 November)
• regrets for RDF Data Access 2 Nov (Tuesday, 2 November)
• ws-policy use caes (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Technical Plenary F2F scheduling (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: 1st WD request for DAWG documement "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: 1st WD request for DAWG documement "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Tuesday, 12 October)
• scribe for 12 Oct 2004 telecon (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Sunday, 10 October)
• Re: comments/questions on SPARQL document (Sunday, 10 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review [Howard's feedback] (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review [Howard's feedback] (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Tuesday, 5 October)
• agenda: RDF Data Access 5 Oct (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: unsaid/not: any champions? (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Saturday, 2 October)
• Re: CBD - Concise Bounded Description - Member Submission from Nokia (Saturday, 2 October)
• Re: Test cases (Friday, 1 October)

Farrukh Najmi

• Regrets for tomorrow. (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG teleconference 2004-11-09 for review (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Regrets for today (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Regret for today (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Regrets for todays meeting 10/12/2004 (Tuesday, 12 October)

Hiroyuki Sato

• review comment for SARQL (5 nested patterns) (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG 7 Dec (in progress) (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 9 Nov (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Regrets for tomorrow (Monday, 25 October)

Howard Katz

• regrets for the rest of 2004 (Tuesday, 7 December)
• RE: agenda: RDF Data Access 30 Nov (Tuesday, 30 November)
• regrets (Wednesday, 17 November)
• RE: agenda: RDF Data Access 9 Nov (Tuesday, 9 November)
• RE: Minutes of DAWG telecon 2004-10-26 for review (Monday, 1 November)
• regrets (Tuesday, 26 October)
• RE: agenda: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct (Tuesday, 19 October)
• regrets (Tuesday, 12 October)
• RE: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review [Howard's feedback] (Friday, 8 October)
• RE: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review [Howard's feedback] (Friday, 8 October)
• RE: Status update on SPARQL Language document (Friday, 8 October)
• RE: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review [Howard's feedback] (Friday, 8 October)
• RE: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review [Howard's feedback] (Wednesday, 6 October)
• RE: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review [Howard's feedback] (Tuesday, 5 October)
• RE: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Monday, 4 October)

Janne Saarela

• Re: F2F4 information (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Regrets for 7-12-2004 teleconference (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Minutes of the 2004-11-30 DAWG teleconference (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: F2F4 information (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: protocol draft available (Sunday, 14 November)
• Re: literals as numbers (Was: Re: Comments on SPARQL draft) (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: FW: Comments on SPARQL draft (Wednesday, 3 November)
• F2F4 information (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 26 Oct (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-10-05 (Tuesday, 5 October)

jos.deroo@agfa.com

• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) (Sunday, 19 December)
• RE: tests and inference? (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: UNSAID drafted and mapped to SQL (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: Untrusted graphs - examples (Wednesday, 8 December)
• alternative result format using collections - avoid use/mention issues (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Fwd: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: Proposal: querying untrusted graphs (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: let's approve 8 tests: triple-pattern-001 thru example-2-4a (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: let's approve 8 tests: triple-pattern-001 thru example-2-4a (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 23 Nov (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: protocol: updated (radically changed) draft (Monday, 22 November)
• RE: SOURCE - Choosing what to query and querying the origin of statements (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: SOURCE - Choosing what to query and querying the origin of statements (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: test cases for SPARQL CONSTRUCT (Thursday, 11 November)
• test cases for SPARQL CONSTRUCT (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: literals as numbers (Was: Re: Comments on SPARQL draft) (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 2 Nov (in progress; suggestions?) (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: mail-speak [was: Draft: open issues around '?' use.] (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: input to WSDL, since we're using it in SPARQL? (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: definitions for SELECT, projection, substitution [was: [Fwd: Re: ...]] (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct (Tuesday, 19 October)
• regrets for telcon 2004-10-12 (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Re: Variable in SOURCE (Was Re: A few simple tests) (Tuesday, 5 October)
• RE: A few simple tests (Friday, 1 October)

Kendall Clark

• Re: Suggested modification for CONSTRUCT (Thursday, 30 December)
• Re: Abstract protocol URIs (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: [Protocol] was: Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Dec 2004 (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Dec 2004 (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Small items for SPARQL (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: query parameter name clashes? (Friday, 17 December)
• query parameter name clashes? (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Rough sparql protocol and result format hack (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: ACTION: propose test case for scalar constraint with syntax (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: Updated DAWG variable binding results XML format (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: sparql protocol simplex updated (protocolRootReferent issue) (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: sparql protocol simplex updated (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: "non-XML" RDF format (Thursday, 9 December)
• sparql protocol simplex updated (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: scribe for tomorrow? (7 Dec) (Monday, 6 December)
• Re: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Issue with the result set format (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: Updated DAWG variable binding results XML format (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: Issue with the result set format (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: protocol: updated (radically changed) draft (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: protocol: updated (radically changed) draft (Monday, 22 November)
• protocol: updated (radically changed) draft (Friday, 19 November)
• minutes and next week's meeting? (Friday, 19 November)
• regrests (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Wednesday, 10 November)
• XML 2004 in DC -- attending? (Tuesday, 9 November)
• protocol draft available (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: objecting to $ alone (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: objecting to $ alone (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: objecting to $ alone (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Minutes of DAWG telecon 2004-10-26 for review (Monday, 1 November)
• regrets (Tuesday, 26 October)
• Re: Draft: open issues around '?' use. (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: input to WSDL, since we're using it in SPARQL? (Thursday, 21 October)
• Re: definitions for SELECT, projection, substitution [was: [Fwd: Re: ...]] (Wednesday, 20 October)
• Re: Simple source tests (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Simple source tests (Tuesday, 19 October)
• protocol draft -- update (Monday, 18 October)
• minutes for 10-12-2004 meeting (Monday, 18 October)
• hmm, I could do w/out this reference to... (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: 1st WD request for DAWG documement "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Tuesday, 12 October)
• uc&r 1.140 for publication (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: UC&R ready for review (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: unsaid/not: any champions? (Monday, 4 October)
• UC&R ready for review (Friday, 1 October)
• Re: more on FROM's necessity (Friday, 1 October)
• Re: more on FROM's necessity (Friday, 1 October)
• Re: FW: URI string substructure queries - labelling/filtering use case (Friday, 1 October)
• more on FROM's necessity (Friday, 1 October)
• Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement (Friday, 1 October)
• Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement (Friday, 1 October)

Kevin Wilkinson

• Re: feedback on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF", v1.139 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• feedback on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF", v1.139 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Status update on SPARQL Language document (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: Status update on SPARQL Language document (Sunday, 10 October)

Matthieu Fuzellier

• Re: 1st WD request for DAWG documement "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: 1st WD request for DAWG documement "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Tuesday, 12 October)

Pat Hayes

• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Apologies (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: UNSAID drafted and mapped to SQL (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Suggested modification for CONSTRUCT (Sunday, 19 December)
• Re: ACTION: propose test case for scalar constraint with syntax (Sunday, 19 December)
• Re: UNSAID drafted and mapped to SQL (Sunday, 19 December)
• Re: CONSTRUCT / template merging. (Sunday, 19 December)
• apologies and regrets (Tuesday, 7 December)
• comments/questions on SPARQL document (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: UC&R ready for review (Monday, 4 October)

Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com

• Some thoughts on effective access to "primary" vs "secondary" resources, consistency of descriptions, and bootstrapping the semantic web... (Friday, 8 October)

Seaborne, Andy

• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: RDF/ML and testcases (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: specify the language without reference to implementation; keep inference orthogonal (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) (Wednesday, 22 December)
• UNSAID - two test cases (Wednesday, 22 December)
• [Protocol] was: Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Dec 2004 (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Dec 2004 (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) (Monday, 20 December)
• Re: Small items for SPARQL (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Small items for SPARQL (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Small items for SPARQL (Friday, 17 December)
• Small items for SPARQL (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: query parameter name clashes? (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Rough sparql protocol and result format hack (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Definition of constraint? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: ACTION: propose test case for scalar constraint with syntax (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: review comment for SARQL (5 nested patterns) (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review (Monday, 13 December)
• Re: UNSAID drafted and mapped to SQL (Friday, 10 December)
• CONSTRUCT / template merging. (Friday, 10 December)
• Re: sparql protocol simplex updated (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: sparql protocol simplex updated (protocolRootReferent issue) (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: sparql protocol simplex updated (protocolRootReferent issue) (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: sparql protocol simplex updated (Thursday, 9 December)
• Re: TKS/Kowari named graph usage (Wednesday, 8 December)
• Re: apologies and regrets (Wednesday, 8 December)
• Re: Fwd: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Untrusted graphs - examples (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: alternative result format using collections - avoid use/mention issues (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Re: feedback on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF", v1.139 (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: "entails" clearer than "subgraph" in defn Graph Pattern Match (Friday, 3 December)
• Re: Fwd: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: feedback on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF", v1.139 (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Yoshio's review (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: feedback on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF", v1.139 (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: Yoshio's review (Thursday, 2 December)
• Re: feedback on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF", v1.139 (Wednesday, 1 December)
• Re: feedback on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF", v1.139 (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Yoshio's review (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Proposal: querying untrusted graphs (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: Issue with the result set format (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: Indicating bNodes in XML result sets (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: Issue with the result set format (Friday, 26 November)
• [Fwd: SPARQL: SOURCE is suboptimal] (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: "entails" clearer than "subgraph" in defn Graph Pattern Match (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: puzzled by Pattern Solution 2nd sentence (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: puzzled by Query Solution defn (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Minutes of 2004-11-23 teleconference for review (Tuesday, 23 November)
• RE: URIs in constraints, isBound, casting in eq (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: URIs in constraints, isBound, casting in eq (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: URIs in constraints, isBound, casting in eq (Monday, 22 November)
• Issue with the result set format (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: URIs in constraints, isBound, casting in eq (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: "entails" clearer than "subgraph" in defn Graph Pattern Match (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: protocol: updated (radically changed) draft (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: let's allow the same terms everywhere, esp in triple patterns (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: protocol: updated (radically changed) draft (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: OUTER JOIN and DISJUNCTION (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Constrinat synatx (was Re: OUTER JOIN and DISJUNCTION) (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 16 Nov (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: definitions for SELECT, projection, substitution [was: [Fwd:Re:...]] (Friday, 12 November)
• Test cases for $ and ? (was: Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG teleconference 2004-11-09 for review) (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Friday, 12 November)
• RE: SOURCE - Choosing what to query and querying the origin of statements (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: definitions for SELECT, projection, substitution (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: test cases for SPARQL CONSTRUCT (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Thursday, 11 November)
• Indicating bNodes in XML result sets (Thursday, 11 November)
• Implementation of the DAWG specs (was: Re: Minutes of RDF DAWG teleconference 2004-11-09 for review) (Thursday, 11 November)
• RE: definitions for SELECT, projection, substitution [was: [Fwd: Re:...]] (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: SOURCE - Choosing what to query and querying the origin of statements (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: Work in progress on rq23 (Tuesday, 9 November)
• RE: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues (Monday, 8 November)
• Work in propgress on rq23 (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: SPARQL grammar 2004-10-12 lex/yacc conflicts feedback (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues (Monday, 8 November)
• RE: A present for Guy Fawkes night (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: A present for Guy Fawkes night (Friday, 5 November)
• A present for Guy Fawkes night (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: literals as numbers (Was: Re: Comments on SPARQL draft) (Thursday, 4 November)
• FW: Comments on SPARQL draft (Wednesday, 3 November)
• RE: Comments in SPARQL (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Re: Illustratation of prefix interaction details (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: Draft: open issues around '?' use. (Monday, 1 November)
• RE: SPARQL Query WD 20041012 examples (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: RDF Data Access Working Group : first working draft of SPARQL] (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: 3store+rdf store compatability tests added (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: Simple source tests (Tuesday, 19 October)
• [Fwd: Coments on first working draft of SPARQL] (Sunday, 17 October)
• [Fwd: Re: RDF Data Access Working Group : first working draft of SPARQL] (Sunday, 17 October)
• SELECT and constants: (was RE: Simple source tests) (Friday, 15 October)
• RE: Simple source tests (Friday, 15 October)
• RE: Simple source tests (Friday, 15 October)
• Simple source tests (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: Preliminary material for section "value testing" (Wednesday, 13 October)
• RE: Preliminary material for section "value testing" (Wednesday, 13 October)
• Re: Named Containers : a framework for aggregation and query (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: Named Containers : a framework for aggregation and query (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Preliminary material for section "value testing" (Tuesday, 12 October)
• Re: Named Containers : a framework for aggregation and query (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: Status update on SPARQL Language document (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: Status update on SPARQL Language document (Monday, 11 October)
• RE: Another alternative to OR (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: Another alternative to OR (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Monday, 11 October)
• Status update on SPARQL Language document (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: comments/questions on SPARQL document (Friday, 8 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Thursday, 7 October)
• RE: unsaid/not: any champions? (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Wednesday, 6 October)
• Variable in SOURCE (Was Re: A few simple tests) (Tuesday, 5 October)
• bNodes in named graphs (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: UC&R ready for review (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Named Containers / was: Re: UC&R ready for review (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: unsaid/not: any champions? (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: [Fwd: FROM keyword unnecessary?] (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: unsaid/not: any champions? (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: FW: URI string substructure queries - labelling/filtering use case (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: more on FROM's necessity (Friday, 1 October)
• SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Friday, 1 October)

Simon Raboczi

• Re: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review (Tuesday, 14 December)
• ACTION: propose test case for scalar constraint with syntax (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Minutes of 2004-11-16 teleconference for review (Sunday, 21 November)
• Re: let's allow the same terms everywhere, esp in triple patterns (Sunday, 21 November)
• Re: OUTER JOIN and DISJUNCTION (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: OUTER JOIN and DISJUNCTION (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: OUTER JOIN and DISJUNCTION (Monday, 15 November)
• Re: Comments on SPARQL draft (Friday, 5 November)
• minutes: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct (non-IRC version) (Sunday, 24 October)
• tolog: a query language for topic maps (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Sunday, 10 October)
• Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review (Friday, 8 October)

Steve Harris

• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) (Thursday, 23 December)
• Re: SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) (Wednesday, 22 December)
• RDF/ML and testcases (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: UNSAID - two test cases (dawg:unbound, issues#useMentionOp) (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: UNSAID + inference tests (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) (Wednesday, 22 December)
• Re: UNSAID + inference tests (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) (Tuesday, 21 December)
• UNSAID + inference tests (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: data consistency tests with UNSAID and OPTIONAL (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Re: Suggested modification for CONSTRUCT (Sunday, 19 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) (Sunday, 19 December)
• Re: query parameter name clashes? (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Small items for SPARQL (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Rough sparql protocol and result format hack (Friday, 17 December)
• Re: Rough sparql protocol and result format hack (Friday, 17 December)
• Rough sparql protocol and result format hack (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• Re: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review (Wednesday, 15 December)
• Re: Question on variable scope w.r.t. multiple optional blocks (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: tests around comparators in the graph constraint (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: Question on variable scope w.r.t. multiple optional blocks (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Regrets for 2004-11-30 telecon (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Work in progress on rq23 (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: commas or no commas (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: Work in propgress on rq23 (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: objecting to $ alone (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Appologies for 2004-11-09 telecon (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Comments in SPARQL (Tuesday, 2 November)
• ACTION: SteveH to take rs:size out of expected results from all tests (Monday, 1 November)
• Re: Illustratation of prefix interaction details (Monday, 25 October)
• Re: Simple source tests (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: RDF Data Access Working Group : first working draft of SPARQL] (Monday, 18 October)
• Re: SELECT and constants: (was RE: Simple source tests) (Friday, 15 October)
• dawg-source-simple-* (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: Simple source tests (Friday, 15 October)
• 3store+rdf store compatability tests added (Friday, 15 October)
• Re: Simple source tests (file: URIs in test materials) (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: Simple source tests (Thursday, 14 October)
• Re: Preliminary material for section "value testing" (Wednesday, 13 October)
• Re: Preliminary material for section "value testing" (Wednesday, 13 October)
• Re: Another alternative to OR (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: Another alternative to OR (Monday, 11 October)
• Another alternative to OR (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: Named Containers / was: Re: UC&R ready for review (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Re: unsaid/not: any champions? (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: unsaid/not: any champions? (Monday, 4 October)
• Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement (Saturday, 2 October)
• Re: more on FROM's necessity (Friday, 1 October)
• Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement (Friday, 1 October)
• Re: Proposal to drop disjunction requirement (Friday, 1 October)

Thompson, Bryan B.

• RE: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• RE: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)
• RE: tests and inference? (Thursday, 16 December)

Tom Adams

• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 21 Dec 2004 (Tuesday, 21 December)
• Scribe apology (Thursday, 16 December)
• Protocol review status and belated regrets (Thursday, 16 December)
• TKS/Kowari named graph usage (Tuesday, 7 December)
• Fwd: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Re: Permanent model names in TKS/Kowari (Tuesday, 23 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Sunday, 21 November)
• Permanent model names in TKS/Kowari (Sunday, 21 November)
• Re: protocol draft available (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: Minutes of DAWG telecon 2004-10-26 for review (Tuesday, 2 November)
• Minutes of DAWG telecon 2004-10-26 for review (Monday, 1 November)
• Sample iTQL queries and result formats for subqueries vs. disjunction (Tuesday, 19 October)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 12 Aug (Monday, 11 October)
• Re: unsaid/not: any champions? (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: unsaid/not: any champions? (Thursday, 7 October)
• Re: Named Containers : a framework for aggregation and query (Tuesday, 5 October)
• Comments from SWBP&D WG (Tuesday, 5 October)

Yoshio FUKUSHIGE

• Re: Question on variable scope w.r.t. multiple optional blocks (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Re: Question on variable scope w.r.t. multiple optional blocks (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Question on variable scope w.r.t. multiple optional blocks (Tuesday, 14 December)
• Yoshio's review (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 9 Nov (Tuesday, 9 November)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 December 2004 16:55:49 UTC