W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 16 Nov

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:22:58 +0000
Message-ID: <4198C9D2.6070408@hp.com>
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org

 > ACTION: AndyS to write a test cases which use ? and $ in the same query

Done:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0289.html

	Andy

Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> 1. Convene, take roll, review agenda
> 
>  RDF Data Access Working Group
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
>  Tuesday 2004-11-16 9:30am-11:30am/14:30-16:30 UTC
>  Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD")
>  supplementary IRC chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>    log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/11/16-dawg-irc
> 
> chair: EricP
> scribe: SimonR
> regrets: 
> 
> Next meeting: Tuesday 2004-11-16 at 14:30 UTC,
>  provided a chair and scribe emerge
>  regrets: DanC for 16 Nov, 23 Nov, 30 Nov
> 
> PROPOSE: to accept as a true record:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0264.html
> as amended by
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0267.html
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0289.html
> 
> propose to continue these without discussion:
> ACTION DanC: owner of issue 'yes or no questions' (pending protocol doc)
> ACTION AlbertoR: owns issue 'DESCRIBE'
> ACTION: SteveH is willing to adapt his testing infrastructure to  
> generate input/output RDF/XML and typed nodes into manifest file
> ACTION EricP: find logistics re F2F5 at tech plenary in Boston March
>   28 Feb - 4 Mar (2 days).  Some WG preference to Mon/Tue of that week.
> 
> 
> 2. FTF 4
> 
> 19-20 January 2005 Espoo, Finland (Hosted by Profium)
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0211.html
> dress warmly!
> 
> ACTION DanC: Make a dawg f2f4 registration form
> DONE
> See
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0268.html
> 
> 
> 3. Protocol
> 
> Protocol draft:
>   [protocol] http://monkeyfist.com/kendall/sparql-protocol/
> 
> ACTION KendallC: expose our walking tour data to SPARQL querying clients
>   ETA before F2F4
> 
> ACTION TomA: read the protocol draft [protocol] and email a review to
> the WG before the next telcon 2004-11-09
> 
> ACTION JanneS: read the protocol draft [protocol] and email a review to
> the WG before the next telcon 2004-11-09
> DONE
> See
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0293.html
> 
> 4. SPARQL SOURCE Issue
> 
> Any more discussion of
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0241.html
> ?
> 
> ACTION JanneS: review
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0256.html
> and check what happens when no source support is implemented
> 
> ACTION DaveB: update the dawg test repository to record or amend
> tests to correspond to the
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0241.html
> proposal
> 
> ACTION DanC: suggest formal definitions for SOURCE
> 
> 
> 5. SPARQL Disjunction issue
> 
> ACTION SimonR: explain how much of disjuction can be done with
> optionals, nested or otherwise.  Point to references, problems with
> LEFT OUTER JOIN in the literature.
> Related:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0294.html
> 
> ACTION SteveH: own (i.e. propose resolution to) disjunction issue
> 
> ACTION SteveH: owns issue 'nested optionals'
> 
> 
> 6. SPARQL update, issues
> 
> See
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
> 
> ACTION EricP: supply definitions for SELECT (vars ordered or not?) ala
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0151.html
> WITHDRAW?
> See
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/thread.html#265
> and look for "Definition: Projection" in
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#select
> 
> 
> ACTION PatH review SPARQL def'ns post-publication
> 
> ACTION: AndyS to write a test cases which use ? and $ in the same query
> 
> DanC asked for somebody else to help on reading and responding to the
> 
> ACTION: Tom Adams volunteered and got the job to read the list, respond
> and pass on things to/from the WG and the comments list.
> [ ACTION interpreted from 
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0264.html ]
> 
> 
> 7. Next SPARQL WD: timing, reviewers
> 
> next WD: December
> 
> ACTION DanC: notify SemWeb CG of EbXML possible sync point in April
Received on Monday, 15 November 2004 15:23:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT