W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: Small items for SPARQL

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 17:51:56 -0500
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20041217225156.GC6125@monkeyfist.com>

On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 04:15:43PM -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:

> It makes sense to document the contents of the test
> files in the test suite description, and it makes
> sense to specify encodings in URIs and bodies in
> the protocol...

I haven't thought a lot about this yet, but it's on the list. I'd been
assuming UTF-8, but I want to think about all of this in terms of the
HTTP/HTML charset/encoding mess, to see if there are any exceptions

Sometimes it's appropriate, even patriotic, to be ashamed
of your country. -- James Howard Kunstler
Received on Friday, 17 December 2004 22:53:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:45 UTC