W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

are SOURCE consumers OK with it being optional?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 08:52:11 -0600
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1101135131.27188.111.camel@dirk>
Dave, I don't recall getting a reply to my questions
about your source proposal...
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0256.html

In particular,

 I think you're suggesting that there are 2 query results for queries
 that use SOURCE and that implementations are free to return
 either. Is that right?

Or perhaps there are 2^N correct results, where N is the
number of SOURCE clauses.

And now a question to the customers...
For the use cases where SOURCE is used, is that going to work?
i.e. when they send a SOURCE query, is it OK if they sometimes
get a source and sometimes don't?


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 22 November 2004 14:51:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT