W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

objecting to $ alone (was Re: SPARQL 2004-10-12 syntax and grammar issues)

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:58:13 +0000
To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20041108135813.799ba200@hoth.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 08:19:05 -0500, Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com> wrote:
...

> Just FYI, I'm pretty sure I would formally object if "$" alone is
> chosen. Hate to say that, but I think it's a bad (even if relatively
> small) mistake.

Why is it a mistake?  You don't give any reason in this email.
If it's such a mistake that mindlab will formally object to any document
that contains it, you better say more.

See also the W3C process doc
  http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/policies.html#WGArchiveMinorityViews

Dave
Received on Monday, 8 November 2004 14:01:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT