I'm looking for issues we can close easily, and the name thing seems pretty well settled: I'm getting pretty much uniformly positive feedback on SPARQL. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#languageProtocolName But people then ask "what does it stand for?" I think the original proposal was "Simple Protocol and RDF Query Language" -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0500.html but we haven't propagated that expansion into the draft(s). I propose that we do so. Hmm... what become of "ACTION EricP: set up a naming poll using WBS"? http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf3-brs#sec-abs I guess we dropped it somehow. It doesn't seem worthwhile to me. Does anybody still want to do that? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Friday, 10 December 2004 23:04:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:00 GMT