- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:29:48 -0500
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 03:45:58PM +0000, Dave Beckett wrote: > I've updated the result formats I did 2004-09-28 described in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0556.html > to add a <variables> header describing the variable names > as well as a form for returning blank nodes. > > In addition to those changes I wrote XQuery scripts for reading the > two XML result formats and generating HTML tables with the bindings. > This was pretty straightforward for both formats and I don't see that > this gives a strong indication of a the choice between the two > formats - schemaless or with schema. Dave, I thought we'd agreed (as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0588.html) that the attribute name should be "uri" instead of "href"? I quote our exchange from the end of Sept: >> I'd prefer, then, that this example look, in pertinent part, like >> this: >> >> <result> >> <hpage uri="http://work.example.org/alice"/> >> ... > I can live with that change. No need to imply retrieval or > html-like semantics. And 1 char shorter :) Did that get reversed or forgotten or something else? Kendall Clark
Received on Monday, 13 December 2004 14:31:20 UTC