W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

RE: tests and inference?

From: <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 23:43:40 +0100
To: connolly@w3.org
Cc: andy.seaborne@hp.com, "Bebee, Bradley R." <BRADLEY.R.BEBEE@saic.com>, "Thompson, Bryan B." <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFD6C2BF85.4FE42C7E-ONC1256F6D.007B2E4A-C1256F6D.007CD8A8@agfa.com>

Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 09:10 -0500, Thompson, Bryan B. wrote:
>> Hum.  I think that testing for protocol conformance would be part of a
>> data access test suite ... but, let's focus on the other question:
>>   "Can DAWG deliver a test suite for the query language?"
>> It seems that unless there is a means to constrain what inference may
>> be performed in response to a query, that the behavior of the query
>> processor can not be tested.
> Inference affects the input graph. Our tests state the input
> graph explicitly. Given the input graph, the results of the
> query are determined by the spec*.
> * or... at least: I hope so;
> the SOURCE designs seem to have multiple answers, and some
> of the value testing designs do to; I sure hope we don't
> choose those designs.

hm.. design issues
don't see it..
can they be made observable as a test?

Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 17 December 2004 22:44:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:45 UTC