On Nov 30, 2004, at 10:57 AM, Kendall Clark wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:53:24AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > >> Just forwarding the message to the WG without analysis/comment >> isn't as helpful. The bits were already available to everybody. I gather Tom's msg was in reply to a request from the chair during a telcon. > Doesn't this assume that WG members follow the comments list? I don't > know that that's true. Whether a WG member follows the comments list or not, the bits are available if they want to get them. The comments archive is linked from the WG homepage. > And, to defend Tom a bit more, this isn't "just another comment" from > someone interested in our work. It's rather more delicate than that, > IMO. > > Kendall Clark -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:37:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:41:59 GMT