W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:37:58 -0500
Message-Id: <93568F70-42F6-11D9-B5C9-000D9338C596@w3.org>
Cc: Tom Adams <tom@tucanatech.com>, DAWG list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: kendall@monkeyfist.com

On Nov 30, 2004, at 10:57 AM, Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:53:24AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
>> Just forwarding the message to the WG without analysis/comment
>> isn't as helpful. The bits were already available to everybody.

I gather Tom's msg was in reply to a request from the chair
during a telcon.

> Doesn't this assume that WG members follow the comments list? I don't
> know that that's true.

Whether a WG member follows the comments list or not, the
bits are available if they want to get them. The comments archive
is linked from the WG homepage.

> And, to defend Tom a bit more, this isn't "just another comment" from
> someone interested in our work. It's rather more delicate than that,
> IMO.
> Kendall Clark

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2004 17:37:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:45 UTC