- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:19:22 -0600
- To: andy.seaborne@hp.com, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:52:48AM +0000, Seaborne, Andy muttered something about: > > <variables> > > <hpage/> > > <name/> > > <mbox/> > > <age/> > > </variables> > > That would do just fine. I like that. I wonder, in cases where we know hpage is a resource (and thus its value is really a URI) whether <hpage uri=""/> adds anything? Is it just the variable names we need here, nothing about their types? > I have been asking around as to the preferences of result1 vs result2 forms. > Not a scientific survey but I haven't come across any support for form 1, and > very quickly people pick on the lack of schema-checking on it. Schema support is overrated, IMO. Especially in such a simple format. Anyway, I vastly prefer form1 to form2. Kendall Clark
Received on Friday, 26 November 2004 16:19:44 UTC