W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: Simple source tests

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:33:30 +0100
Message-ID: <417525BA.9080406@hp.com>
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Steve Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 09:36:42AM -0400, Kendall Clark wrote:
>>On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 10:39:30AM +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>>>All the tests could be run - I ran all the tests before committing them
>>>to CVS the first time.
>>I'm trying to catch up by staring hard at these tests till I
>>understand what the hell a "CNC" is (!!), but I have a basic
>>publishing problem.
> I cant remember what CNC stands for, but it is a possible syntax for a
> sigle file containing multiple graphs IIRC.

CNC = Collection of Named Containers.

A Named Container (of triples) is part of the overall collection and has a 
a name.  The collection is all the triplesand also the way to view all the 

I don't think anyone has proposed a syntax for a single file containing 
multiple graphs.  There doesn't seem to be a need to be such a syntax - we 
just need a framework for accessing aggregations and exposing source 
information.  Ideally, we don't define how collections come about, just 
that they exist to be queried.


>>When I click on links ending with ".rq" in the dawg-source-simple
>>sections of the testcases, I get the W3C's "Sorry, Forbidden"
>>page. Same with ".n3" files.
> Sorry thats my fault, I cant seem to change the permissions at the moment
> though. The reason that the source graphs for dawg-source-simple-* aren't
> in the docuemnt is that the queries pull them in with FROM (as I
> understand it), Andy and I had a discussion about this last week. They
> wont be in the tarball either as thier not listed in the manifest.
> - Steve
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 14:34:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:45 UTC