- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 03:38:45 +0000
- To: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:17:26AM -0500, Kendall Clark wrote: > > Les Chiens, > > I'm relieved (!) to say that I've finally got a protocol draft that > I'm willing to publicly share, in the event anyone's still > interested. You can find it at > > http://monkeyfist.com/kendall/sparql-protocol/ Commenting on protocol-wd.html,v 1.1 2004/11/09. Havent fully digested it, but I'm still very interested :) some inital observations: getOptions is not REQUIRED, from my experiences with Z39.50 I would say this is a mistake. Query example 1.1 seems to be a select that returns a section of an RDF graph (rather than a graph that describes a result set), I haven't URL decoded the string, but I dont see how that works. Why do the HTTP binding arguments have []'s round them? I dont have a particular problem, with it, but it seems unneccesary, and a bit of a break from the norm. - Steve
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2004 03:38:49 UTC