W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

RE: agenda: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct

From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:03:13 -0700
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NFBBKEMEJKFJGCPOOKHCAEIEDIAA.howardk@fatdog.com>

Regrets for tomorrow. I thought I was living in paradise but had my main
desktop machine and my wife's laptop stolen last week and am still
rebuilding environments and reconstructing lost work. Turns out you can't
get away from crackheads no matter where you live. Most, but not everything,
was backed up. I've got maybe a week's worth of (unnecessary) work ahead of
me. Losing the computer wasn't my fault; losing the data was. A good (tho
not particularly enjoyable) lesson to learn.
Ta,
Howard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Dan Connolly
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 8:13 AM
> To: RDF Data Access Working Group
> Subject: agenda: RDF Data Access WG 19Oct
>
>
> 1. Convene, take roll, review record and agenda
>
>   RDF Data Access Working Group
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
>   Tuesday 2004-10-19 10:30am-12:30pm/14:30-16:30 UTC
>   Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD")
>   http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343
>   supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>     log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/10/19-dawg-irc
>
> roll call
> Scribe: Simon Raboczi
> Regrets: Andy Seaborne (?)
>
> PROPOSED: to accept
>  minutes for 10-12-2004 meeting
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0132.html
> as a true record of our meeting 2004-10-12
>
>
> next meeting: Tuesday, October 26, 2004
>   scribe volunteer, please?
>
> propose to continue these 2 without discussion:
>
> ACTION KendallC: expose our walking tour data to SPARQL querying clients
>  ETA before F2F4
> ACTION EricP: find logistics re F2F5 at tech plenary in Boston March
>  28 Feb - 4 Mar (2 days).  Some WG preference to Mon/Tue of that week.
>
> and note this done without discussion:
>
>  ACTION DanC: talk with Kendall about issues list maintenance
>
> changes to the agenda?
>
>
> 2. Publication of SPARQL design and Data Access UC&R
>
> woohoo!
>
>  SPARQL Query Language for RDF
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20041012/
>
>  RDF Data Access Use Cases and Requirements
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-rdf-dawg-uc-20041012/
>
>
> 3. Feedback on the SPARQL design
>
>  [Fwd: Coments on first working draft of SPARQL]
>  Seaborne, Andy (Sunday, 17 October)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0130.html
>
> and a few others.
>
> ACTION: PatH review SPARQL def'ns post-publication
>
> ACTION Dirk: provide details about DB interfaces, re '?' and '$'
>
> To what extent are these issues addressed by the 12Oct drafts?
>
> ACTION AlbertoR: owns issue 'DESCRIBE'
>
> ACTION SteveH: own (i.e. propose resolution to) disjunction issue
>
> ACTION SteveH: owns issue 'nested optionals'
>
> ACTION: Tom to send sample iTQL queries and result formats for
> subqueries vs. disjunction
>
> ACTION DanC: owner of issue 'yes or no questions'
>
>
> 4. Web Services Constraints and Capabilities
>
> ACTION EricP: draft UC on overlap between RDF query and web service
> constraints with respect to WS-Policy continues.
>
>
> 5. SOURCE
>
> ACTION: SteveH to turn his SOURCE tests into SPARQL ones
>
> dawg-source-simple-* Steve Harris (Friday, 15 October)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0124.html
>
> ACTION DaveB: Update the source section 9, add more formal links,
> update the examples, try to think about extra constraints as EricP
> proposed (SOURCE ?s and ?s only in in SELECT). Look at various
> people's source test cases.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 04:05:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT