DanC wrote: > On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 06:23, Seaborne, Andy wrote: >> Attached is a revised set of tests that I have changed to be in be in >> the current syntax. > > Has anybody else tried these? Yes and we can only run query1 and query3a in AndyS original message http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0541.html Among other things, our code can't handle unbound ?src in ?src.log:semantics log:includes {...}. (is how we actually try to do the SOURCE ?src (...)(...)) -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/Received on Friday, 1 October 2004 23:08:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT