On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 10:06:28AM +0000, Dave Beckett wrote: > > Simon suggested we look at expressing that in the WHERE clause: > > > > SELECT ?title ?price > > WHERE (?book dc:title ?title) > > (?book ns:price ?price) > > (?price op:lessThan 42) > > > > which would presumable match the above data. But would it match > > It won't work with any existing RDQL-like system I have seen > as it is assumes an entirely different operation from matching > triples and closer to rules. I oppose this expansion. +1 it quickly becomes unwieldy if you have some complex expressions, or functions like WHERE (?place1 :lat ?lat1) (?place1 :long ?long1) (?place2 :lat ?lat2) (?place2 :long ?long2) AND :withinKilometers(50.0, ?lat1, ?long1, ?lat2, ?long2) - SteveReceived on Tuesday, 14 December 2004 10:40:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT