W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:49:37 -0600
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1102949377.5431.434.camel@dirk>

On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 14:34 +0000, Dave Beckett wrote:
[...]
>      ISSUE: Normativeness of the XML schemas. Pick one?
> 
> I write in RELAX NG compact, so that'd be the only one I'd be
> confident in.

Is the RELAX NG schema really a complete definition of the
syntax? Does it capture, for example, the connection
between the names inside <variables> and the names
inside <result>?

Test case:

<dawg-result xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/result">
  <variables><a/></variables>
  <results>
    <result>
      <x id="r2"/>
    </result>
  </results>
</dawg-result>

I can't figure out how to test whether that matches the .rnc schema.
I suspect (a) it does match and (b) it's not a valid result.

> I've updated
>   SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/
I see $Revision: 1.7 $ of $Date: 2004/12/13 14:29:09 $


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 13 December 2004 14:49:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT