- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:58:47 -0400
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Minutes of RDF DAWG teleconference 2004-10-12T14:30Z for review
Agenda:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0096.html
IRC log:
http://www.w3.org/2004/10/12-dawg-irc
Scribe: Kendall Clark
AGENDA
1. Convene, take roll, review record
Present:
Kendall Clark
Dan Connolly
Pat Hayes
Andy Seaborne
Kevin Wilkinson
Simon Raboczi
Eric Prud'hommeaux
Janne Saarela
Steve Harris
Regrets:
Dave Beckett,
Jos De Roo,
Howard Katz,
Farrukh Najmi
RESOLVED: to accept telecon meeting record 5 Oct 2004
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0053.html
Next meeting 2004-10-19 14:30 UTC
Regrets: Andy Seaborne (?)
Chair: Dan Connolly
Scribe: Simon Raboczi
(Regrets for 26 October: Andy Seaborne)
2. Publication of SPARQL
Draft has moved into W3C machinery, from which we hope some good
information will escape soon. [Draft now published.]
PatH -- technical problems in definitions, which have been addressed,
but he hasn't re-engaged since then. AndyS would appreciate review of
doc up to 4.3 -- post-pub review, that is.
ACTION: PatH review SPARQL def'ns post-publication
3. Publish UC&R
EricP has req'd pub from W3C team. Status for UC&R is that we think we
are finished. No pending objectives or requirements, and editor would
like to stop adding use cases
SimonR: may have a use case for counting. PatH: DAML ql potential
users wanted counting
4. SPARQL Protocol
KendallC: protocol draft under furious work, should have something to
show soonish -- for next week's meeting, ideally.
5. "Web Services Constraints and Capabilities" taken up [from DanC]
EricP: attending the WS C&C workshop today; we anticipate a report
from him next week.
ACTION EricP: draft UC on overlap between RDF query and web service
constraints with respect to WS-Policy continues.
6. Issues List
DanC: reformatted issues list from table to list
7. SOURCE
SteveH: happy w/ amount of work re: SOURCE tests he's done so far;
could do more later, if necessary
ACTION: SteveH to turn his SOURCE tests into SPARQL ones
ACTION SteveH: test cases (10 or so) re: current SOURCE design. -- COMPLETED
ACTION AlbertoR: real test cases re: current SOURCE design. -- COMPLETED
ACTION DaveB: Update the source section 9, add more formal links,
update the examples, try to think about extra constraints as EricP
proposed (SOURCE ?s and ?s only in in SELECT). Look at various
people's source test cases. -- CONTINUES
These actions CONTINUE:
ACTION SteveH: owns issue 'nested optionals'
ACTION AlbertoR: owns issue 'DESCRIBE'
ACTION DanC: owner of issue 'yes or no questions'
ACTION SteveH: own (i.e. propose resolution to) disjunction issue
ACTION DanC: talk with Kendall about issues list maintenance
ACTION: Tom to send sample iTQL queries and result formats for
subqueries vs. disjunction
8. Comments from SWBP&D WG
Rest assured, we are doing something HTTP-based.
9. comment from P. Dawes
DanC: we have some obligation to pay some attention to comments that come in from others.
ACTION: AndyS formally respond to phil dawes's comment, closing that loop for now
Also, note: Jeremy Carroll's comments:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Sep/0007.html
We informally note that this input is interesting and it will be considered in due course
RESOLVED: Adjourn
Received on Monday, 18 October 2004 13:58:52 UTC