W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: test case details by 26 Oct telcon

From: Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 15:49:30 +0200
Message-Id: <DC5867EA-2755-11D9-9F6B-0011242E4018@asemantics.com>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>


here are some contributions to the DAWG tests machinery discussion


and more general email about manifest and query tests vocabularies



On Oct 22, 2004, at 1:16 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:

> Last tuesday we struggled to make progress on the SOURCE
> issue in part because I couldn't figure out exactly
> how tests work.
> Let's please get the testing details worked out
> during, if not before, next week's teleconference.
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/
> I hope to put the question on the first few tests...
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-001
> thru
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-003
> The organization is kinda inconvenient for me;
> the description of how the tests actually work is in
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/README.html
> and even there it's not quite clear to me exactly what
> the definition of correct results is. Hmm...
> "A test passes if the graph from the action is the same as the graph
> named in the result. "Same as" is are the two graphs bNode isomorphic:
> same shape, same labels."
> I guess I need to study that a bit more.
> I'm particularly interested in whether the result
> {solutionX, solutionX} is considered a passing or
> failing result when the expected result is {solutionX}.
> I had hoped to do more homework before sending this out;
> sorry I don't have more details.
> I only got as far as studying the definitions again.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ 
> 0151.html
> Anybody who finds time to work on this, please connect
> to irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg while you're at it, if
> that's not too much hassle.
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Alberto Reggiori, Senior Partner, R&D @Semantics S.R.L.
alberto@asemantics.com  www.asemantics.com
Milan Office, milano@asemantics.com,   +39 0332 667092
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2004 13:49:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:45 UTC