W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

agenda: RDF Data Access 12 Aug

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:08:41 -0500
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1097503721.5269.412.camel@dirk>
1. Convene, take roll, review record and agenda

  RDF Data Access Working Group
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
  Tuesday 2004-10-12 10:30am-12:30pm/14:30-16:30 UTC
  Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD")
  http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343
  supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
    log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/10/12-dawg-irc

scribe: ?VOLUNTEER_PLEASE
regrets: Dave Beckett, Jos De Roo

PROPOSED: to accept
  Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon 2004-10-05
 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0053.html
as a true record.

next meeting: Tuesday, October 19, 2004
  scribe volunteer, please?


propose to continue these 3 without discussion:

 ACTION Dirk: provide details about DB interfaces, re '?' and '$'

 ACTION KendallC: expose our walking tour data to SPARQL querying clients
 ETA before F2F4

 ACTION EricP: find logistics re F2F5 at tech plenary in Boston March
 28 Feb - 4 Mar (2 days).  Some WG preference to Mon/Tue of that week.

comments on the agenda?


2. Publication of SPARQL

ACTION: KendallC to spell check/grammar check document
 done? withdraw?

ACTION: DaveB, HowarkD, SteveH work with editors and decide whether to 
publish
seems done-ish? critical path is down to EricP now?
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/

I have only skimmed the flurry of email. Is there any outstanding
disagreement? Are there any technical points that should be captured
as test cases? Any requests for new issues?


3. Publish UC&R

ACTION KendallC: fine-tune UC&R and then publish
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases

done-ish:

  uc&r 1.140 for publication
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0071.html

critical path is down to EricP


4. SPARQL Protocol

ACTION KendallC: talk to creative commons people
about an RDF query interface to their search service.
ETA 1-2 weeks from 16 Sep

ACTION KendallC: write a protocol document draft (est delivery in 1
month from 17 Sep).


5. Web Services Constraints and Capabilities

ACTION EricP: draft UC on overlap between RDF query and web service
constraints with respect to WS-Policy


6. Issues

Any progress to report?

ACTION SteveH: owns issue 'nested optionals'

ACTION AlbertoR: owns issue 'DESCRIBE'

ACTION DanC: owner of issue 'yes or no questions'

ACTION SteveH: own (i.e. propose resolution to) disjunction issue

ACTION DanC: talk with Kendall about issues list maintenance


7. SOURCE

ACTION SteveH: test cases (10 or so) re: current SOURCE design.
see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0549.html

ACTION AlbertoR: real test cases re: current SOURCE design.
see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0551.html

ACTION AlbertoR: (with SteveH) edit the examples into test cases
(either positive or negative tests)
see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0327.html

ACTION DaveB: Update the source section 9, add
more formal links, update the examples, try to think about extra
constraints as EricP proposed (SOURCE ?s and ?s only in in
SELECT). Look at various people's source test cases.
note: current spec has source for interrogation and constraint.
note:

ACTION: Tom to send sample iTQL queries and result formats for 
subqueries vs. disjunction


8.  Comments from SWBP&D WG
Tom Adams (Tuesday, 5 October)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0049.html

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 11 October 2004 14:08:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT