W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: UNSAID + inference tests

From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:12:59 +0000
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20041222111259.GC8105@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>

On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 01:55:00 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 18:44 +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 04:56:32PM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> > > 
> > > I've added the tests from
> > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0538.html
> > > 
> > > As http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-unsaid-001
> > > 
> > > I believe this completes my action from the 2004-12-21 telecon, assuming
> > > the translation is correct
> > 
> > I've just read Andy's mail where he says UNSAID doesnt bind variables,
> > that seems quite supprising to me (and makes UNSAID less useful, but much
> > less painful to optimise), but I'l change the test to an ASK.
> 
> I was a little surprised too about UNSAID not binding variables too,
> though it makes sense when I think about it.
> It seems worthwhile to keep that test around too.

OK, sure. FWIW, I'm not sure it does make sense, its a doable operation,
its just very expensive in the general case.

> Please make a test out of the ASK and the SELECT.
> 
> And please make a test ouf of the 1st case from 0538 too, i.e.
> the one that's not about UNSAID but about inference.

I did, dawg-unsaid-001, its just confusingly named. dawg-unsaid-002 is the
real UNSAID one.

- Steve
Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2004 11:13:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT