W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 9 Nov

From: Alberto Reggiori <alberto@asemantics.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 13:03:40 +0100
Message-Id: <6545117C-3247-11D9-BE1A-0011242E4018@asemantics.com>
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

regrets for today's telecon - I am in Norway far away from a fix /  
cheap phone line till next monday

Alberto


On Nov 8, 2004, at 11:10 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:

> 1. Convene, take roll, review agenda
>
>  RDF Data Access Working Group
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
>  Tuesday 2004-11-09 9:30am-11:30am/14:30-16:30 UTC
>  Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD")
>  supplementary IRC chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>    log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/11/09-dawg-irc
>
> scribe: Dave Beckett
> regrets: Steve Harris at ISWC
>
> Next meeting: Tuesday 2004-11-16 at 14:30 UTC,
>  provided a chair and scribe emerge
>  regrets: DanC for 16 Nov, 23 Nov, 30 Nov
>
> PROPOSE: to accept as a true record:
>
> propose to continue these without discussion:
> ACTION DanC: owner of issue 'yes or no questions' (pending protocol  
> doc)
> ACTION AlbertoR: owns issue 'DESCRIBE'
> ACTION: SteveH is willing to adapt his testing infrastructure to
> generate input/output RDF/XML and typed nodes into manifest file
>
>
> 2. Use Cases
>
> ACTION Eric to ask Kendall to put X509 policy use case into UC&R
>
> done-ish:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ 
> 0205.html
>
> advice to the editor?
> editor's inclination?
>
>
> 3. ftf 4
>
> 19-20 January 2005 Espoo, Finland
>
> Janne points to some directions and requests a registration form
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ 
> 0211.html
>
>
> 4. ftf 5
>
> ACTION EricP: find logistics re F2F5 at tech plenary in Boston March
>   28 Feb - 4 Mar (2 days).  Some WG preference to Mon/Tue of that week.
> some progress:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ 
> 0185.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ 
> 0144.html
>
> Note WBS form on tech plenary scheduling nightmare
>  http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34786/TP05prep/results
>
>
> 5. Protocol, Interoperability Demonstration Services
>
>  A present for Guy Fawkes night Seaborne, Andy (Friday, 5 November)
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ 
> 0220.html
> and following
>
> ACTION KendallC: write a protocol document draft
>
> ACTION KendallC: expose our walking tour data to SPARQL querying  
> clients
>   ETA before F2F4
>
>
> 6. SPARQL update, issues
>
> note progress in recent draft
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ v1.128 2004/11/08 15:27:14
>
> ACTION EricP: supply definitions for SELECT (vars ordered or not?) ala
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ 
> 0151.html
>
> ACTION PatH review SPARQL def'ns post-publication
>
> ACTION: AndyS to write a test cases which use ? and $ in the same query
>
> Chair would like to talk about the public comments list a bit,
> esp. re spreading the load.
>
>
> 5. SOURCE Issue
>
> ACTION DaveB: Update the source section 9, add more formal links,
> update the examples, try to think about extra constraints as EricP
> proposed (SOURCE ?s and ?s only in in SELECT). Look at various
> people's source test cases.
>
> progress:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/ 
> 0241.html
>
>
> 6. Disjunction issue
>
> ACTION Simon: explain how much of disjuction can be done with
> optionals, nested or otherwise.
>
> Note I have accepted Steve's regrets, but these seem nearby:
>
> ACTION SteveH: own (i.e. propose resolution to) disjunction issue
> ACTION SteveH: owns issue 'nested optionals'
>
>
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
>
-
Alberto Reggiori, Senior Partner, R&D @Semantics S.R.L.
alberto@asemantics.com  www.asemantics.com
Milan Office, milano@asemantics.com,   +39 0332 667092
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 12:03:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT