On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 10:28 -0500, Kendall Clark wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 09:19:31AM -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 10:09 -0500, Kendall Clark wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 09:02:13AM -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > > > > > How about adding... > > > > > > > > "The dataset gives the exact graph against which the query is > > > > evaluated (no further inference is used to determine the > > > > input graph)." > > > > > > Better: "The dataset gives the precise graph against which the query > > > is to be evaluated: inference must not be used to determine or modify > > > the input graph." [...] > > Also, graphs aren't mutable. > > Huh? Graphs, like integers, strings, sets, etc. aren't mutable; they don't have state. They don't change. To speak of modifying them is imprecise, at best. The set {a} is related to the set {a, b} but {a} can't be modified to become {a,b}. It just is {a}. Likewise, the graphs that serve as input to our tests just are what they are. If we modify the file that specifies the input graph, we don't modify the input graph; we change the test to take a different input graph. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Thursday, 16 December 2004 15:53:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:00 GMT