W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: sparql protocol simplex updated (protocolRootReferent issue)

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 20:27:20 +0000
Message-ID: <41B8B528.4080905@hp.com>
To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>


Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 03:48:17PM +0000, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> 
> 
>>Kendall says the design is neutral to service-centric vs model-centric 
>>viewpoints, with multiple operations per service end point (SP)
>>already.  
> 
> 
> Actually, I've been saying something weaker: I worked hard to try to
> keep the design as neutral as possible. That was a primary design
> goal. Not sure if I succeeded or not.

Sorry to mischaracterise.  Could say what it is saying that is weaker?  I 
thought I had the widest characterisation that it allowed of service or 
model centric, and multiple or single operations per service access point 
(concrete protocol level).

	Andy
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2004 20:27:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:21 GMT