W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: SPARQL / Language spec ready for review

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:48:11 -0400
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, Dave Beckett <Dave.Beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>, Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20041002004811.GC30220@w3.org>
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 04:06:04PM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 11:28, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> > Dave, Steve, Howard,
> > 
> > The SPARQL language doc is ready for review in preparation for the telcon next 
> > Tuesday.  Version v1.73 (or later) of:
> > 
> >      http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
> cool.
> Hmm... the hello world example involves returning bNodes from the
> query. Maybe that could be pushed to a later example?

Yeah, that's always a conundrum. The most socially interesting data
is best modeled with bNodes and IFPs.

How volatile should we consider this? I.e. is it OK to change the
exmaple if we come up with a better one?
Also, do you have a better one?

office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
                        Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
                        5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
        +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
cell:   +1.857.222.5741 (does not work in Asia)

Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

Received on Saturday, 2 October 2004 00:48:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:45 UTC