Re: let's allow the same terms everywhere, esp in triple patterns from Simon Raboczi on 2004-11-21 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from October to December 2004)

From: Simon Raboczi <raboczi@tucanatech.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:42:02 +1000
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-Id: <BE796E6C-3BBA-11D9-85D3-000A95C5686E@tucanatech.com>

On 21/11/2004, at 5:01, Dan Connolly wrote:

> w.r.t.
>
>
> The set of triple patterns is
>     (RDF-U union RDF-B union V) x (RDF-U union V) x (RDF-T union V)
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
>   $Revision: 1.137 $
>
> Let's make that
>     (RDF-T union V) x (RDF-T union V) x (RDF-T union V)

+1

This does imply the existence of "SPARQL graphs" as a superset of RDF 
graphs.  I'm quite comfortable with this.

Received on Sunday, 21 November 2004 12:42:41 UTC