- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 23:46:49 +0000
- To: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 02:55:11 +0000, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > > Steve Harris wrote: > >On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:17:26AM -0500, Kendall Clark wrote: > > > >>Les Chiens, > >> > >>I'm relieved (!) to say that I've finally got a protocol draft that > >>I'm willing to publicly share, in the event anyone's still > >>interested. You can find it at > >> > >> http://monkeyfist.com/kendall/sparql-protocol/ > > > > > >Commenting on protocol-wd.html,v 1.1 2004/11/09. > > > >Havent fully digested it, but I'm still very interested :) some inital > >observations: > > > >getOptions is not REQUIRED, from my experiences with Z39.50 I would say > >this is a mistake. > > Steve - if it were just for query operations, what sort of information > would go in the "options" returns? Does Z39.50 experience suggest it is > details of the operations available or details about the data graph? Details of the operations. The idea is to be able to automatically use a remote serive without having to iterate over all the methods testing them. As I understand it this wasnt originally envisioned as a use for z3950, so the "what hethods are implemented" method was optional. - Steve
Received on Friday, 12 November 2004 23:46:53 UTC